I understand the last sentence of the stimulus which states that higher temperature = higher molecule movement. The second sentence states 'rhodopsin molecules sometimes change shape because of normal molecular motion, thereby introducing error into the ...
... for Saturday's test is PT77. Initially I thought this was ... 't taken a recent enough PT (I did sit for September ... taking sections from a newer PT today (scattering them throughout the ...
... March 10, 7-9pm EST, PT 67
Sunday, March 17 ... , 7-9pm EST, PT 69
Sunday, March 24 ... , 7-9pm EST, PT 71
Sunday, March ... 31, 7-9pm EST, PT 73
Sunday, April ... April 14, 7-9pm EST, PT77
Sunday April 21, 7 ...
I've signed up for the November LSAT but haven't done any PTs in the 80s recently (I did 83 and 84 a long time ago). So for I'm only up to PT77. Are there any noticeable differences between these two sets?
Can anybody help me with this question, because it is driving me crazy.
Why is B wrong? The stimulus clearly states "**any**given individual molecule of substance can activate..." how is this statement not supporting B?
And how can C be ...
So this question is _really_ hard in my opinion-- I have been looking at this problem for quite a while and I still can't see why A is correct. Can anyone explain why A was correct here?
I'm confused as to why we ruled out spent fuel rods on the basis that they never contain "significant" quantities of tellurium isotopes? In the first sentence of the stimulus, it just states that they found "radioactive isotopes of iodine, tellurium, and ...
sch.
c=.. fail to consider the human costs that consumers pay in nationalized insurance
p- high tech medicine is restricted
p2- transplants are rationed
p3- people are denied treatments they want and need
-
laf.
Hi! I don't really understand why B is wrong even after reading numerous explanations. If areas subject to **more fires** (which is true when the level of rainfall drops below normal for an extended period of time like in a drought) tend to be **less ...
Could someone explain exactly what L is doing in response to S's argument? I thought both were interpreting access in different ways, for S it was about access to high tech care and for L it was about access to basic healthcare. I just feel that there is ...
After I read the stimulus, am I supposed to just go to the answer choices? I couldn't anticipate what the potential answer could be...I had issues with A and E
Premise: more varieties of mate in P than anywhere else+ more widely used than anywhere ...