@DumbHollywoodActor said:
This explanation requires far less assumptions (especially the difficult-to-swallow “The two options give COULD be the ONLY options”) than those previously mentioned.
I had LG1 and 2 and know 1 was real because of London/Madrid/Paris but having a hard time differentiating the other games. Can someone post the letters of variables used in the real games if that's allowed?
... 2-star for 72/77 LG. That's too low and ... the easiest LG in recent history for PT-69 and PT-71 LG. LG sections are rated 5-point ... look OK overall. Same for PT 77, where game 3 was ... such thing as an "easy" LG section for me personally).
Haha @"mandy xu" I felt the same way about LG. They weren't particularly hard but I didnt have time to answer some inference and could be true questions. I actually thought that the other PT 70s LG sections were easier, with the exception of PT 72
... 's twist on JY's LG fool proof method has been ... an option to purchase an LG Bundle with all of the ... .
I have done the LG1-35 bundles at least twice ...
... , really old PTs (i.e. PT1 - 36) help, since J.Y ... questions while studying, your PT scores from 1 - 36 may be inflated ... discussion forum. Just put the PT #, section #, and question # along with ...
... I mean: Diagraming conditionals: PT 36 Section 1 question 11. Before I ... apply conditional logic to the 1 star MBT questions, if you ... people that can do 35-1-22 by not diagramming it ...
... that it has taken me 1 calendar year: about 1200 games ... from scratch. Start with PT 2 Game 1. Do it three times ... it cannot go in spot 1. These are the reoccurring inference ... time.
@lllllllll said:
Because McElligott's citrus juices HAVE NOT BEEN LINKED TO ANY BACTERIAL INFECTIONS, can't I assume that they contain less infectious bacteria than M'S apple juice?
No, you can never assume. All we know is that the ...