We want an answer that contradicts the stimulus, not one that is irrelevant. The stimulus essentially states that if you’re restricting, then you preventing negative effects. TO contradict that,we negate it: Restricting AND not preventing negative effects. ...
Interesting. You're positive the NA isn't actually necessary? I'm curious about these examples. I didn't look closely at it, but PT 71.S1.Q11 seems to be about pollution. Is that the right reference? PT means PrepTest, right?
The stimulus doesn't allow us to conclude this. Grass clippings are one way to get micro-nutrients, but the stimulus doesn't say it's the ONLY way. Thus, when the ...
... think Han Purple is PT74.S1.Q17(https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations ... -17/ ) and Dioxin is PT45.S1.Q12 (https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat ...
... glimmer of hope about older PT being good for even a ... , & then I’ll take PT83 a couple weeks before feb ... good plan. You're already PT'ing about as good as ...
... the conditional sequencing game in PT83,- JY decided not to split ... , he did decide to split (PT 73 game 1). JY is ... I pointed out -- PT61 and PT 52 Game 2, my issue ...
I definitely think that the Multiverse passage from PT83 is my favorite. I loved the subject matter and the writing style. I definitely consider myself lucky for seeing it on the actual test date.
@Gunningfor121 Yeah, try LG from PTs 81, 82, and 84. The general trend recently has been easier LGs and tougher RCs, with PT83 being the only exception.
> @eRetaker said:
> @"Llama Whisperer" uhh judicial candor was PT 82. Did you accidentally enter your answers into PT83 when you actually took PT 82 instead?
Good point! Judicial cander passage is from PT82 (Sep 2017 LSAT)!