@DumbHollywoodActor said:
This explanation requires far less assumptions (especially the difficult-to-swallow “The two options give COULD be the ONLY options”) than those previously mentioned.
@Nathanial said: PT 72 game 4 i came in to the ... loop. Also game 3 in PT 76 I feel is a ... miss an easy linear game 4 because game 3 was strange ...
... which still gives me roughly 4 months to take PTs but ... will only get up to PT 67 instead of 72 which ... (2 a week for PT taking for 4 months which is what ... , then will only getting to PT 67 be detrimental to my ... to take practice exams for 4 months I am assuming to ...
I think that’s a good general rule. Check out PT 24 Game 4, great application of this. It’s not how JY does it, but by splitting into three boards based on the second rule which does exactly what you’re talking about, this game was a breeze.
@runiggyrun thanks for detail explanation I saw this happen in the PT 26 game 4 with a sub-category that have one out spot only V,Z,Y and Z is always in and by splitting the game board based on V,Z,Y the game is solved completely.
Just a correction: 72 does not have a circular. 72 has what can readily be described as a pattern game, Game 4. 75 Game 4 is a bit odd: I didn't like it. 77 Game 3 is odd. Finally, PT 79 Game 4 is odd.
@nantesorkestar said:
I just can't see any assumptions the argument is making. In my opinion, C might weaken the argument if the insertion occurs at a random spot. Doesn't this contradict that the fragments are in the same location?
... as I have about 2-4Q's that I really couldn ... say that strengthen/weaken/flaw Q's are my worst. When ... do you revisit your missed Q's? Also would you mind ...