HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt13 | 43 | 44 |
| s2 | 1.1K | 1.6K |
| q8 | 63 | 73 |
-
Need Help with MSS v. Strengthen, v. Correlation/Causation StrengthenI am stuck on some of the MSS questions, Weaken, and the difference with how to tell MSS and Strengthen apart especially when C/C Strengthen is in pl…
... .
For example, PT 16, S2, Q21 was on a webinar ... -
PT50.S2.Q09 - one should always capitalizeHi 7sagers, I just recently solved the question referenced above, a MBT question with heavy conditional reasoning. I understand why TCR is what i…
Hi 7sagers,
I just recently solved the question referenced above, a MBT question with heavy conditional reasoning. I understand why TCR is what it is, but it took me WAY too long to solve this question. Even in hindsight/BR, I don't know ... -
PT54.S2.Q21 - most people who become migraine sufferers hi, can someone explain why answer choice e isnt a match? I'm still not 100% sure after BRing and watching the explination vid. https://7sage.com/l…
hi, can someone explain why answer choice e isnt a match? I'm still not 100% sure after BRing and watching the explination vid.
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-54-section-2-question-21/ -
Principle or PSA?Principle or PSA question? ------------ In LR, I try to identify the question type as quickly as possible, but sometimes I cannot identify immediat…
... />
But for example, PT57.S2.Q1. says:
>_ ... />
=============================================
Is Q39.S2.Q11 a PSA question?
------------
Also, 7Sage labeled Q39.S2.Q11 as PSA, but I ... -
PT17.S2.Q21 - nuclear reactors are sometimes builtHi All, I could use some help with this necessary assumption question. I definitely see why C is a necessary assumption, but I'm having a hard tim…
Hi All,
I could use some help with this necessary assumption question. I definitely see why C is a necessary assumption, but I'm having a hard time figuring out why E is not also an equally necessary assumption. I have yet to find an ... -
PT22.S2.Q25 - a recent survey showed thatHey, guys! Can you help me make sense of my reasoning for selecting this answer choice, if that makes sense?! Lol Ok so I chose D but I get why B …
Hey, guys! Can you help me make sense of my reasoning for selecting this answer choice, if that makes sense?! Lol
Ok so I chose D but I get why B is correct. I still don't know for certain that I wouldn't have the same thoughts that lead me ... -
PT17.S2.Q11 - because an elected official needsSo I chose answer choice A because author Q simply states, " ought to have been effective, but he has not been" the author is just saying that he's b…
So I chose answer choice A because author Q simply states, " ought to have been effective, but he has not been" the author is just saying that he's been ineffective but doesn't offer up any evidence as to why he is ineffective. Can someone explain to me ... -
PT23.S2.Q14 - kim: in northern europe during the 18th centuryHey everyone! I'm pretty confused about this question. Could anyone speak more on why (C) is incorrect? I chose it because I thought it was block…
Hey everyone!
I'm pretty confused about this question. Could anyone speak more on why (C) is incorrect? I chose it because I thought it was blocking out an alternative cause to the cited change in attitude: philosophers spreading their ... -
PT27.S2.Q15 - it is often said that beauty is subjectiveHey everyone! Could anyone shed some light as to the issues with (D)? I didn't select it because I had an eerie feeling about it, but even as I r…
Hey everyone!
Could anyone shed some light as to the issues with (D)? I didn't select it because I had an eerie feeling about it, but even as I read over it now I can't seem to put my finger on why it's incorrect. The more I read (D), the ... -
PT19.S2.Q24 - the united states ranks far behind countries such as swedenSo I chose D because I thought that the conclusion of the stimulus was that the US is behind in the sense that they should make these safety regulati…
So I chose D because I thought that the conclusion of the stimulus was that the US is behind in the sense that they should make these safety regulations a requirement not that they aren't actually safe because in the stimulus it says that they are all ... -
PT10.S2.G4Was wondering if someone could give me an explanation in there osn words https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-10-section-2-game-4/
Was wondering if someone could give me an explanation in there osn words
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-10-section-2-game-4/ -
PT37.S2.Q05 - although consciousness seems to arise from physical processesIm having some trouble with this question so I chose A because I thought that this is what was needed to make the conclusion valid and I didn't choos…
Im having some trouble with this question so I chose A because I thought that this is what was needed to make the conclusion valid and I didn't choose B because it says " must encompass MORE than " and I took the conclusion to mean that physical theories ... -
Parallel method of reasoning woesHey guys! I'm finding that I'm still having trouble really intuitively knowing when my job in Parallel Method of Reasoning q's is to mirror the lawg…
... of answer choice. (Ie. PT17.s2.q24 from Problem Set 3 ... -
PT20.S2.P4 (Q26) - in the dynamics of apocalypseHey everyone! Having a bit of difficulty with this passage. It's from the first RC problem set in the core curriculum. I was wondering if anyone coul…
Hey everyone! Having a bit of difficulty with this passage. It's from the first RC problem set in the core curriculum. I was wondering if anyone could add to JY's explanation for #26 and explain how (E) is supported? I chose (A), but I felt uneasy about ... -
PT73.S2.Q20Hi guys! I wanted to get some clarification on the logic that makes this answer E rather than D. The stem is that the argument relies on the assum…
Hi guys! I wanted to get some clarification on the logic that makes this answer E rather than D.
The stem is that the argument relies on the assumption, but my current understanding is that neither answer accomplishes this, though E has more ... -
PT June 2007.S2.Q22 - editorialist: news mediaSharing this because while eliminating AC E, I was forced to question the difference between causation and sufficiency as well as the danger of using…
Sharing this because while eliminating AC E, I was forced to question the difference between causation and sufficiency as well as the danger of using Lawgic as shorthand when you're not actually dealing with conditional statements.
Most ... -
PT68.S2.Q15 - psychologists recently conductedHi, I BR-ed this question, read the explanations from various websites and sources, and this question is still not making much sense to me. The …
Hi, I BR-ed this question, read the explanations from various websites and sources, and this question is still not making much sense to me.
The correct choice D has "probably" in it, which when negated is "not likely." Doesn't "not likely" ... -
"Mathy" Questions drilling?Sharing this in hopes that it might be useful to some: In an effort to feel more comfortable with "mathy" questions (involving proportions, percen…
... - percent
PT02.S2.Q04 - average
PT02.S2.Q14 - average
PT02.S2.Q16-17 - percent ... -
PT15.S2.Q17 - Most people believe that yawningHi, I understand that answer choice D is correct, but I have been struggling for quite a bit on eliminating answer choice B. Can anyone explain wh…
Hi,
I understand that answer choice D is correct, but I have been struggling for quite a bit on eliminating answer choice B. Can anyone explain why this is incorrect?
When I was doing this question, I noticed two errors in ... -
PT9.S2.Q23 - a poor farmer was fond ofThe negation of poor is not poor. The question assumes that you are either rich or else poor. What about the middle class?
The negation of poor is not poor. The question assumes that you are either rich or else poor. What about the middle class? -
PT61.S2.Q24 - historian: it is unlikely that someoneHey everyone, So question 24 in section 2 of Prep Test 61. This question I've been trying to grapple with for 3 days (seriously). I understand h…
Hey everyone,
So question 24 in section 2 of Prep Test 61.
This question I've been trying to grapple with for 3 days (seriously). I understand how conditionals work, but this question just doesn't work for me no matter how many times ... -
PT55.S2.P2(Q09) & PT55.S2.P4(Q23)Hi all, Having trouble with 2 questions in pretest 55, and I'd love to get some further explanation if anyone would be so kind! In the second p…
Hi all,
Having trouble with 2 questions in pretest 55, and I'd love to get some further explanation if anyone would be so kind!
In the second passage(s) in RC, for question #9, I chose C. Is this wrong because of the "most"; I ... -
PT19.S2.Q18 - in the past decadeCan someone please breakdown this question for me?? https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-2-question-18/
Can someone please breakdown this question for me??
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-2-question-18/ -
PT21.S2.Q19 - spectroscopic analysis has revealed - super hard NA q.Hello, This is an NA question that I have been trying to grasp. It's REALLY hard. I will explain how I can justify the to myself and I would be…
Hello,
This is an NA question that I have been trying to grasp. It's REALLY hard.
I will explain how I can justify the to myself and I would be so grateful if anyone wants to chime in and add any additional analysis.
< ... -
PT3.S2.Q25 - the public in the united statesI can't see why E is a better AC that D. Any thoughts? Flaw Argument Summary: Context: The presence of X has conditioned the US to support a …
I can't see why E is a better AC that D. Any thoughts?
Flaw
Argument Summary:
Context: The presence of X has conditioned the US to support a substantial defense budget.
Premise 1: X is gone.
Conclusion: ... -
PT12.S2.Q7 (G2) - five childrenSo I didn't do so well on this game because I played the children multiple times because it didn't say that they had to be played exactly once, so sh…
So I didn't do so well on this game because I played the children multiple times because it didn't say that they had to be played exactly once, so should we assume that they need to be played at least once unless stated otherwise? Thank you!!! -
PT33.S3.Q8 - stock marketI'm a little confused about why the video explanation shows the first sentence as PISM --most--> /DOR. I thought that the "without" would negate the…
I'm a little confused about why the video explanation shows the first sentence as PISM --most--> /DOR. I thought that the "without" would negate the first part of the sentence and it would look like /PISM --most--> DOR. If someone could explain ... -
PT44.S2.Q20 - research indicatesSo i see why AC (B) demolishes the argument and is clearly the correct AC. But does AC (A) weaken it as well? https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/l…
So i see why AC (B) demolishes the argument and is clearly the correct AC. But does AC (A) weaken it as well?
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-44-section-2-question-20/ -
PT77.S2.Q18 - historian: those who claimI eliminated answer choice D because it says, "fails to exclude...." As I see it, answer choice D would perfectly address the flaw in the argument if…
I eliminated answer choice D because it says, "fails to exclude...." As I see it, answer choice D would perfectly address the flaw in the argument if it said something like, "excludes the possibility..." or "fails to consider the possibility...." Am I ...
