HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt4 | 82 | 87 |
| s4 | 1K | 1.3K |
| q22 | 192 | 213 |
-
how to time myself if I dont use 7sage timer7Sage timer shows error and stops itself sometimes without my knowledge while I am taking a PT, which throws off my time completely. How would you re…
Filtering / Searching for questions in 7sage database by difficulty level?Hi, I am interested to find out if there is a way I can search for questions inside the 7sage database by difficulty level. When you look at the …
... doing something like "s1" or "s4" to get the one you ...Studying for December rewriteI confidently blew through almost all of my study materials in preparation for the September test, not anticipating that I would need to rewrite. I w…
... questions in on S3 or S4 on test day. Fortunately, I ...A Fun Strategy for LR?I had read about this strategy before on various forums, but never decided to take the plunge. Then I finally decided to force myself to do the follo…
... ....
Example:
PT32, S4, Q15
Doctors should never ...Videos of Sages doing LSATsI just saw that there was a new video that showed a very good student working through an LSAT logic game in real time, with JY providing color commen…
Weird Games HighlightThere's been a lot of concern about weird game types appearing or potentially appearing in this era of LSAT. I think it's a healthy concern, and is p…
Pt 15 - S4 - Game 2 (Country of Zendu)< ... lawgic
Pt 6 - S4 - Game 4 (Network of Bridges ... lines
Pt 6- S4- Game 3 (eight benches)
Does "A causes B" equal to A -->B?Hi, guys, I am confused with the relationship between "causation" and conditional logic. Could anyone give me some help? According to the lessons, it…
... -->B. However, in PT25-S4-Q12, this rule does not ...PT64.S1.Q22 - microbiologist: because heavy metalshttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-64-section-1-question-22/ The following is my reasoning for why the answer to PT64S1Q22 is D, and is not B. …
@jac376 said:
Flaw: The correlation of Ra, C, and (C --> Rh) does not mean there is a causation from C to Ra. The answer which strengthens this argument will show that (Rh --> Ra) (C causes Ra because it causes Rh which causes Ra) or directly ...Causation LogicCan you conclude from A cause B cause C that A cause C?
Yup, PT65,S4,Q6 is a good example of this. You may think of this in real life as a sort of "indirect cause", but it's causation nonetheless.
