HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt46 | 37 | 47 |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 4 | 14.4K | 19.8K |
| game | 11.7K | 23.3K |
-
Kaplan/Barron's/test prep books without real LSAT questions for startingI've heard form multiple sources that reccommend that I only buy books that use real LSAT questions (unlike Kaplan, Barro's, etc) I have over a ye…
... ; @10000019
>
> Section 1 (Games): 12 correct, 11 ... incorrect
> Section 2 (Arguments): 13 correct, 11 ... correct, 16 incorrect
> Section 4 (Reading Comprehension): 15 correct, 12 ... -
Looking for morning pre-LSAT advice...Interested to learn about what other students do the morning prior to the exam...in December I was up quite early, read a bit of my book to get the b…
... case scenario. Everyone has a section they are weakest on. Visualize ... test and saw RC for section 1. I literally (quietly) laughed ... get an experimental RC for section 4. It helped relax me so ... -
PT14.S4.Q9 - anyone who supports the new tax planI'm really having trouble with this question. Am I supposed to approach it as a sufficient assumption question though it's a flaw question? Thanks in…
I've been really looking into sufficient/necessary flaws lately. A particularly difficult way in which the test writers described the flaw appears on PT A section 4 question 20. -
How to do flaw q when you can't see the flaw/prephaseI know JY advises against moving onto the ACs without coming up with a prephase for flaw questions, but there are unfortunately usually 2-3 flaw ques…
... /necessary flaw on PT A section 4 question 20 mean? Suggestion #1 ... from the remaining.
4.Drill that question after and ... -
PT26.S1.G3 - each of exactly five personsHi Group, I’m very frustrated because I cannot figure out if S and Y, W and Y, and V and Z are not both or biconditionals for Prep Test 26, Section 1…
... " are not in PT26.S1.Game 3.
> @ ... biconditionals for Prep Test 26, Section 1, Game 3. I believe JY ... correct test for this grouping game problem set 1 was unbelievably ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-26-section-1-game-3/
Could you ... -
Diagramming SA'sTo all of you who are masters of SA's: do you diagram them on the actual exam? I feel that if I don't then, I won't get them correct. Should I diagra…
>@"Alex Divine" said:
>Although there was a tough one about sentient beings on PT62? that I had to diagram...
I remember that one. I skipped first. lol
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-62-section-4-question-18/ -
[Locked] Disturbance in testing room - what happens?I took the test this morning in Irvine, California. An incident occurred that I suspect many test takers will file formal complaints regarding. I'm w…
... began towards the end of section 4. The proctor’s phone also ... -
Help! Fool Proof Method Days Stacking Issue!So I've been fool proofing post CC. I started out on a schedule of 1 PT a day, drilling each game on day 1, 2, and 7. I'm figuring out that games are…
... Game 1 Game 1 Game 1 Game 2 Game 2 Game 3 Game 3 Game 3 Game 3 Game 3 Game 4 Game 4 ...
Day 2: PT 1 Game 1, Game 2 Game 3, Game 3, Game 4, Game 4 ... 2 Game… -
How to go back to curriculumI recently watched the "Post CC Strategies" webinar and something that he had mentioned as apart of the first phase of taking PTs is that we should b…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-55-section-1-question-14/#comment-61460 ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-50-section-4-question-12/#comment-61722
section-4-question-09/#comment-61721
PT44.S4.Q7 - Since empathy is essential forI am stumped by the question PT44-S4-Q7, and the following is the question: <font color="red">**Admin note:** edited; violation of <a href="https:…
... note:** edited; violation of rule 4. "Do not post LSAT questions ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-44-section-4-question-07/
>
PT44.S4.Q7 - Since empathy is essential forI am stumped by the question PT44-S4-Q7, and the following is the question: <font color="red">**Admin note:** edited; violation of <a href="https:…
... note:** edited; violation of rule 4. "Do not post LSAT questions ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-44-section-4-question-07/
> > ...Invalid Vs. Valid Argument Forms (When are these applicable?)I did see a post on distinguishing these argument forms a little while ago, but my question is when are these applicable? I only imagine that these a…
... 7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-17-section-2-question-16/
section-2-question-19/
section-2-question-21/
section-4-question-07/
PT35 ...tips, advice, game plan, trusting the processHi Everyone, Tl;dr: help me score above a 165 plz. I've been lurking in the 7Sage cyberspace for a while, and am incredibly grateful for the co…
... eventually. I found that foolproofing 4 game sections at a time helped ...Sharing results..I had mentioned on a few forums that I'd share my results with ya'll when I got through the CC and did another PT. Well, I had a busy weekend and di…
... last page of questions in section 4 entirely. I felt so dumb ... by +1 on score, and +4 I think on BR.
PT61.S4.Q4 - In polluted industrial English citiesHi all, Sorry for not posting this in the question itself. I have premium so I'm not able to access all the explanations. I’m not understanding…
... the answer to S4 number 4. The problem reads:
> ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-61-section-4-question-04/
Hey ...Examples of Common Flaws#help Hello! Wanted to know if anyone had PT questions for some common flaws that I can watch? I'm looking for a necessary/sufficiency confusion …
At one point I tried to make a list, but I realized there is at least one sufficiency-neccesity confusion per PT :joy:
Here is a (very partial) list of sufficiency-neccesity confusion errors:
PT17.S2.Q11(★); PT22.S4.Q21(★★★); PT23.S2 ...Examples of Common Flaws#help Hello! Wanted to know if anyone had PT questions for some common flaws that I can watch? I'm looking for a necessary/sufficiency confusion …
Hey again,
Here is a _very_ partial list of correlation-causation flaws:
PT20.S1.Q10 (★★★), PT20.S4.Q14 (★★★), PT30.S2.Q25 (★★★★), PT31.S2.Q9 (★★★★), PT64.S1.Q5 (★), PT65.S1.Q8 (★), PT66.S4.Q25(★★★)Just took a dip and am LITERALLY FREAKING OUT.Oh my god. So I just graded my most recent PT (76), I got a 158 and BR 163. I'm literally in shock. I have been consistently scoring in the high 160s…
... the most trouble? I found section 4 LR to be fine. But ... section 2 on this test was ...⭐️ Official June 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread ⭐️Hey guys! Here's the official June 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread. <b><u>Please keep all discussions of the June 2018 LSAT here!</u> </b> We know …
The beer LG section must’ve been experimental. I only had the bonds section (that game was so messy but not too bad once you strip it down)Hooray!Congrats to everyone who took the June test today! I don't know about you guys, but 35min was a LOT shorter for me today than any other days I studie…
... the 35 minutes for each section goes by so fast? I ... my shirt. When we started Section 4, it stung me! I couldn ...⭐️ Official June 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread ⭐️Hey guys! Here's the official June 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread. <b><u>Please keep all discussions of the June 2018 LSAT here!</u> </b> We know …
... going great for me until section 4, when Chipotle had its revenge ...September'18 Study Group | Blind Review PT 39 | Thursday, June 14th | 7:30 pm ESTSeptember'18 Study Group | Blind Review PT 39 | Thursday, June 14th | 7:30 pm EST https://media.giphy.com/media/CkqpoOOS0BCQU/giphy.gif We're s…
... , those who want to do section 4 of LR please message me ...Hooray!Congrats to everyone who took the June test today! I don't know about you guys, but 35min was a LOT shorter for me today than any other days I studie…
... out until the proctor began section 4, and then it really got ...September'18 Study Group | Blind Review PT 39 | Thursday, June 14th | 7:30 pm ESTSeptember'18 Study Group | Blind Review PT 39 | Thursday, June 14th | 7:30 pm EST https://media.giphy.com/media/CkqpoOOS0BCQU/giphy.gif We're s…
... , those who want to do section 4 of LR please message me ... />
I am down, that section destroyed me compared to ...September'18 Study Group | Blind Review PT 39 | Thursday, June 14th | 7:30 pm ESTSeptember'18 Study Group | Blind Review PT 39 | Thursday, June 14th | 7:30 pm EST https://media.giphy.com/media/CkqpoOOS0BCQU/giphy.gif We're s…
I wasn't able to fully participate due to mic issues, but I'm looking forward to the BR calls. I'm down to go over section 4 anytime between Monday and Wednesday. Thank you for organizing this! @keets993September'18 Study Group | Blind Review PT 39 | Thursday, June 14th | 7:30 pm ESTSeptember'18 Study Group | Blind Review PT 39 | Thursday, June 14th | 7:30 pm EST https://media.giphy.com/media/CkqpoOOS0BCQU/giphy.gif We're s…
@keets993 Hello! I am open to do section 4 as well. Also, thanks again for the wonderful BR call, as many mentioned this was my first time too.Stress dreamsAnyone who recently took the lsat (or is just studying for it) been having stress dreams? They’re driving me crazy and leave me more tired than the n…
... the June test, I finished section 1 and blacked out. I ... and everyone was finishing off section 4. The proctor said I had ...⭐️ Official June 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread ⭐️Hey guys! Here's the official June 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread. <b><u>Please keep all discussions of the June 2018 LSAT here!</u> </b> We know …
... Sec. 2, 3, 4 & 5 (missing section 1). Then when I ... , 2, 3 and 5 (missing section 4). Do I just not have ...⭐️ Official June 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread ⭐️Hey guys! Here's the official June 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread. <b><u>Please keep all discussions of the June 2018 LSAT here!</u> </b> We know …
... Sec. 2, 3, 4 & 5 (missing section 1). Then when I ... , 2, 3 and 5 (missing section 4). Do I just not have ...
