I still don't understand why answer choice E is wrong. My understanding is, iIf stress is a symptom of a weakened immune system, then wouldn't that mean that symptoms such as stress then lead to or cause the weakened immune system?
I'm having trouble with this particular question. It is an MBT question, and while I was BR, I read it without translating and was able to pick the right answer correctly, mainly by the elimination method. I tried translating ...
Can someone please help me comprehend why "reducing stress can help weakened immune system" is same as "stress can weaken the immune system" ? It seems like invalid negation to me...
The answer for this question is B. I understand why B is right, but I was not able to fully eliminate why D is wrong (I understand why A, C, and E are wrong). The reason why I am still not sure why D is wrong is because D states that, ...
In this passage, I picked D because I interpreted Rito using the phrase "serious underestimates" as the severity of the underestimate of the raw numbers, while Hiro uses “surely underestimate” as an acceptance that there is an underestimate but not ...
Could someone help me ID what flaw is in the stimulus and why answer choice D is wrong? Is D incorrect because the skeptic is assuming Debbie used another technique aside from the three he was originally testing for? And is the sleight of hand, trick deck, ...
The rule is "Either P is an ingredient or Y is an ingredient, but not both." It's easy enough to see that both of them cannot be in, but does this rule mandate that AT LEAST one of them is in? If so, can you also point me to the lecture in the core ...
A is wrong because we cant say many old people as we dont know the definition of old for Rotelle. If she considers 60+ old or 80+ old.
B is wrong because it says people as old as Sims are the only those. There could be more people.
C is ...
... of stimulus" E.g. PT60.S1.Q7 (P4) - weakened immune system cancer ... question" E.g. PT40.S2.Q7 (G2) - could be true of ... of question" E.g. PT37.S1.Q12 - Political scientist: Efforts to ...
... of stimulus" E.g. PT60.S1.Q7 (P4) - weakened immune system cancer ... question" E.g. PT40.S2.Q7 (G2) - could be true of ... of question" E.g. PT37.S1.Q12 - Political scientist: Efforts to ...
... of stimulus" E.g. PT60.S1.Q7 (P4) - weakened immune system cancer ... question" E.g. PT40.S2.Q7 (G2) - could be true of ... of question" E.g. PT37.S1.Q12 - Political scientist: Efforts to ...
... of stimulus" E.g. PT60.S1.Q7 (P4) - weakened immune system cancer ... question" E.g. PT40.S2.Q7 (G2) - could be true of ... of question" E.g. PT37.S1.Q12 - Political scientist: Efforts to ...
... of stimulus" E.g. PT60.S1.Q7 (P4) - weakened immune system cancer ... question" E.g. PT40.S2.Q7 (G2) - could be true of ... of question" E.g. PT37.S1.Q12 - Political scientist: Efforts to ...
Sharing afew LR problems with conditional language I'd saved over the past few months:
PT09 S2 Q13 PT51S1 Q21 PT51 S3 Q14 PT51 S3 Q19
PT60 S3 Q12
PT71 S3 Q11
PT71 S3 Q17
... of stimulus" E.g. PT60.S1.Q7 (P4) - weakened immune system cancer ... question" E.g. PT40.S2.Q7 (G2) - could be true of ... of question" E.g. PT37.S1.Q12 - Political scientist: Efforts to ...
... of stimulus" E.g. PT60.S1.Q7 (P4) - weakened immune system cancer ... question" E.g. PT40.S2.Q7 (G2) - could be true of ... of question" E.g. PT37.S1.Q12 - Political scientist: Efforts to ...
... of stimulus" E.g. PT60.S1.Q7 (P4) - weakened immune system cancer ... question" E.g. PT40.S2.Q7 (G2) - could be true of ... of question" E.g. PT37.S1.Q12 - Political scientist: Efforts to ...
... of stimulus" E.g. PT60.S1.Q7 (P4) - weakened immune system cancer ... question" E.g. PT40.S2.Q7 (G2) - could be true of ... of question" E.g. PT37.S1.Q12 - Political scientist: Efforts to ...
... of stimulus" E.g. PT60.S1.Q7 (P4) - weakened immune system cancer ... question" E.g. PT40.S2.Q7 (G2) - could be true of ... of question" E.g. PT37.S1.Q12 - Political scientist: Efforts to ...