Hello! If anyone could clarify where I’m misunderstanding, I would be so grateful!
So the diagram for this is: (B - banker, A - athlete, L - lawyer)
B —> A
L—> /B (the contrapositive would be B —> /L)
—
So you ...
for question 16, How is the answer (A) unusual expressiveness ?
I get that it's the best answer out of all of them but what's "unusual" about the era in question? how would we justify this?
@jac376 said:
Flaw: The correlation of Ra, C, and (C --> Rh) does not mean there is a causation from C to Ra. The answer which strengthens this argument will show that (Rh --> Ra) (C causes Ra because it causes Rh which causes Ra) or directly ...