HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt60 | 117 | 135 |
| s3 | 900 | 1.3K |
| 9 | 3.7K | 4.5K |
-
PT60.S3.Q24 - underground rock group's recordingsHelp! I can't wrap my head around this one AT ALL. I'm not even sure what the conclusion is. http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-…
Help! I can't wrap my head around this one AT ALL. I'm not even sure what the conclusion is.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-24/ -
PT60.S3.Q24 - underground rock group's successhttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-24/ Really unclear as to why (B) is the correct answer. The conclusion of the stimu…
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-24/
Really unclear as to why (B) is the correct answer.
The conclusion of the stimulus is about "marks of success."
Answer choice (B) talks about whether a rock ... -
PT60.S3.Q18 - activities that pose risks to lifehttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-18/ I had a lot of trouble with this question picking between A/C (reasons outlined …
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-18/
I had a lot of trouble with this question picking between A/C (reasons outlined below) and am hoping someone could point out the error in my logic.
The stimulus ... -
PT60.S3.Q20 - principle: one should criticizeI am approaching this question as a pseudo-assumption Q, how an I translate to lawgic? Jarrett-->should not have criticized (premise) Pointing ou…
I am approaching this question as a pseudo-assumption Q, how an I translate to lawgic?
Jarrett-->should not have criticized (premise)
Pointing out defects benefitted no one (conclusion)
???? Stuck at this point....< ... -
PT60.S3.Q11 - a mass of "black water"https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-11/ I am having a hard time ruling out A. If black water comes into the bay ONLY once…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-11/
I am having a hard time ruling out A. If black water comes into the bay ONLY once every two centuries, how can the conclusion be a comparative statement, saying that it did not reach ... -
PT60.S3.Q17 - any food that is not sterilized and sealed can contain bacteriahttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-17/ Any food that is not sterilized and sealed can contain bacteria JY’s translati…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-17/
Any food that is not sterilized and sealed can contain bacteria
JY’s translation: /Sterilized or /Sealed -> can contain bacteria
Jy mentions DeMorgan ... -
PT60.S3.Q02 - a study found that consumersHi, I'm not sure why A is wrong...if the number of consumer increased between before the ad. is aired and after the ad. is aired, wouldn't that ex…
Hi,
I'm not sure why A is wrong...if the number of consumer increased between before the ad. is aired and after the ad. is aired, wouldn't that explain the ad. is actually effective?
Or...I thought it shows evidence of what is ... -
PT60.S3.Q10 - A ring of gas emitting X-rays flickeringhttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-10/ I got this one right almost instinctively (I didn't map this out), but I have a…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-10/
I got this one right almost instinctively (I didn't map this out), but I have a question about the phrase "**_can best be explained if_**" in the second sentence of the ... -
PT60.S3.Q22 - consumer advocate: there is no doubtSo I 100% understand why A is the correct answer. I don't need an explanation on that. I need an explanation on how answer choice C, when negat…
So I 100% understand why A is the correct answer. I don't need an explanation on that.
I need an explanation on how answer choice C, when negated, does not destroy our argument.
P1: Government polices have ... -
PT60.S3.Q24 - Music critic: How well an underground rock group'sso i think this PSA Lr question hinges on whether you correctly understand the conclusion. Can someone explain to me how "how well an undergro…
so i think this PSA Lr question hinges on whether you correctly understand the conclusion.
Can someone explain to me how
"how well an underground rock groups recordings sell is no mark of that group's success as an ... -
PT60.S3.Q24: Help.If anyone decides to help me out, please read everything I have asked because I feel that 95% of the comments I get don't answer everything I ask and…
If anyone decides to help me out, please read everything I have asked because I feel that 95% of the comments I get don't answer everything I ask and I often leave with the same number of questions. And yes, I have already looked at Manhattan and ... -
Tips for mastering LR conditional language?Hoping to crowd-source resources. I'm fairly comfortable if I can diagram a sentence but am trying to slowly wean myself off this time-consuming meth…
Sharing afew LR problems with conditional language I'd saved over the past few months:
PT09 S2 Q13
PT51 S1 Q21
PT51 S3 Q14
PT51 S3 Q19
PT60 S3 Q12
PT71 S3 Q11
PT71 S3 Q17 -
Are you doing PTs in order? Or out of order?Leading up to your test date, are you taking PTs in order (like doing PT 80, then 81, then 82, etc)? Or bouncing around? By "bouncing around," I mean…
... PT60 S1 as experimental
PT80, PT60 S2 as experimental
PT71, PT60 S3 ... as experimental
Grade PT60
PT81, PT61 ... -
LSAT Prep Test 9 (October 1993) - S3 - Logic Game 2LSAT Prep Test 9 (October 1993) - S3 - Logic Game 2 Can someone please help me how to split this game into 4 boards?
LSAT Prep Test 9 (October 1993) - S3 - Logic Game 2
Can someone please help me how to split this game into 4 boards? -
PT43.S3.Q01 - photons and neutrinoshttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-43-section-3-question-10/ Can anyone help me about the PT43-S3-Q1? I understand A can fill the gap but i…
... help me about the PT43-S3-Q1?
I understand ... -
Sufficient Assumption QuestionsI have two that I need an explanation to.... if anyone wants to take a crack at them. PT 9, S2, Question 23. PT 15, S3, Question 18. Please & t…
I have two that I need an explanation to.... if anyone wants to take a crack at them.
PT 9, S2, Question 23.
PT 15, S3, Question 18.
Please & thank you! -
LSAT India PT 2 - 2012, S3, Q 10 & 14Hey Everyone, I'm posting here to see if anybody can help me in trying to figure out the answers to two Flaw Questions that appeared in Section 3…
... one would be Q10 in S3. I picked A, based off ... -
BR Groups, Week of August 5th: Weds (PT59), Sat (PT60)I know. You're thinking about skipping out on BR groups this week. It's summer, you're having "fun," and October seems so far away. Well, it's not. D…
... , August 8th at 8PM ET: PT60
Did you ever imagine ... -
PT47.S3.Q19 - although high cholesterol levels (wording question)http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-47-section-3-question-19/ When you encounter the word "contributes" on the LSAT, do you take this to be a "c…
... assumed so, but PT 47, S3, Q19 threw me off by ... -
New iOS 9 may cause 7Sage app issues for some devicesThe newest version of Apple's iPhone/iPad/iPod operating system, iOS 9, was just released earlier today. Upgrading to this new version may cause par…
... /iPad/iPod operating system, iOS 9, was just released earlier today ... on my iPhone with iOS 9 (I got an early release ... />
Sorry if this iOS 9 problem affects your device! We ... -
PT59.S3.Q25 - science writer: all scientists have beliefs<i>Hey 7Sagers! Here's a question from a student I thought you could help out with:</i> I am looking for someone to critique my attempted negation…
... necessary assumption question Dec 2009, s3,q25. Thank you so much ... -
19/2/9Is it possible to post an explanation for 19/2/9?
Is it possible to post an explanation for 19/2/9? -
15 min per LG 9/10 accurate---thoughts?i finally get logic games. i get 9/10 correct but each game takes me around 15 minutes. What can i do to cut it in 1/2 without sacrificing accuracy…
i finally get logic games. i get 9/10 correct but each game takes me around 15 minutes. What can i do to cut it in 1/2 without sacrificing accuracy?
thanks -
[Ended] Webinar: Eliminating Attractor Choices with Sage Jimmy Dahroug | Tues. 2/9 at 4pm ETWe're so excited to be bringing you four (yes, four) FREE webinars this week. <li>Tuesday, 4pm ET: Eliminating Attractor Answer Choices (with Sage…
... Sage Jimmy Dahroug | Tues. 2/9 at 4pm ET
Tue ... , Feb 9, 2016 3:00 PM - 4 ... -
PT9.S3.Q08 (G2) - from a group of seven peopleEven though the question stem doesn't explicitly say "which one of the following could be a *COMPLETE AND ACCURATE* list of people selected" like wha…
... /> https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-9-section-3-game-3
