HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt65 | 87 | 101 |
| s1 | 1.1K | 1.4K |
| q17 | 144 | 152 |
-
PT47.S3.Q20 - absurd to argue that people are morally obligatedPhilosopher: It is absurd to argue that people are morally obligated to act... I am totally lost in the last sentence of this stimulus. Can anyone…
... on finish PT 46 to PT65, which 7sage have all explanation ... -
some thoughts about Harder logical reasoning questionPlease first take a look at two really tough question PT53 sec1 Q16 and PT55-S1-Q21 For PT55-S1-Q21, it seems to be most supported question, but …
Also, I think Jon's explanation about PT55 S1 Q21 may be wrong. http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-55-section-1-question-21/ -
Defining a causal relationshipPrior to the LSAT I've never really considered why A causes B. I'm very unsure of my definition of a causal relationship and would like to put it out…
... my question here is PT45 S1 #12. It asks to weaken ... -
Defining a causal relationshipPrior to the LSAT I've never really considered why A causes B. I'm very unsure of my definition of a causal relationship and would like to put it out…
... causation strengthens.
PT45 S1 #12 is a great question ... PT26, S2, Q12, and PT28, S1, Q5. Those two questions are ... -
Comprehensive Strategy for RC - response to KS in 3 partsHi KS, Perhaps you are taking the Feb LSAT, but given that the Dec test is only 3 weeks away, let me share my RC strategy. Not sure if you have t…
... and Facilities. Then I scribbled S1 P and said to myself ... -
Filtering / Searching for questions in 7sage database by difficulty level?Hi, I am interested to find out if there is a way I can search for questions inside the 7sage database by difficulty level. When you look at the …
... section by doing something like "s1" or "s4" to get the ... -
Highest Score = Longest ReviewI earned my highest score to date and thus far I have spent more time reviewing this test than any previous preptest. What I want to encourage eve…
... such feeling: Superprep Test A, S1, Q11. This NA Q is ... -
A Fun Strategy for LR?I had read about this strategy before on various forums, but never decided to take the plunge. Then I finally decided to force myself to do the follo…
... .
Example:
PT33, S1, Q10
Art historian: Great ... -
Using "most" to eliminate in NA questions - reliable rule?So I know the LSAT doesn't really have 'guaranteed' rules that you can use (other than negation, etc), but has anyone come across a correct LR answer…
... ? I actually got PT 70 S1 Q13 wrong because I picked ... -
Facebook study groupI'm thinking of creating Facebook study group where we can chat with each other about lsat related stuff. I find it hard doing Skype, Google hangsout…
I second @"Nilesh S"
I'm pretty sure it would be against rules to post actual screenshots of the stimulus. But if you use referencing such as "PT 35 S1 Q15" and then post your question about it, then it should be alright. -
Retake disaster/need help from a mod..So I have now taken the LSAT 3 times, and I'm beyond frustrated. I took the LSAT for the first time OCT, 2013 after 6 months of study self-study and …
... (A1), support for that argument (S1), a counter argument/arguments or ... -
RC- Author's attitudeI just wanted to ask what steps most of you take when you are answering questions on RC passages? Can someone give me a list of techniques/method…
... (A1), support for that argument (S1), a counter argument/arguments or ... -
Misc LR questionsI seem to be getting these wrong the most are these misc logic indicator questions or just random questions? Any tips for these?
I'm talking about the Misc Category from 7Sage for example PT 40 S1 Q10, Q15. I see now that I can just figure out the type myself. Like Q10 is something like an Identify the Disagreement type. -
Shift in LR questions PT 65 and above?I just hit PT 65 and 66 and something definitely feels different with LR. Different enough that I have seen a few point dip in my score. The ques…
... to show up in the PT65+ range. What do y'all ... -
Focus on Later PTs for last week of prep or does it not matter?So we have a week left to get ready and I was planning on using my last week to complete PT 50-60(thats as far as i will have gotten). Are the newer …
Later later later! There is definitely a shift after PT65 and while it is subtle, you will be thrown a curve ball if you're not prepared by being exposed to the most modern tests. -
A few small tips for your final LSAT prep.Hi everyone -- I know that many of you are getting ready to take the exam, and so with J.Y.’s blessing I thought it might be helpful for me to pos…
... this method on Saturday for PT65. Literally has never crossed my ... -
I'm back.Hello everyone, I guess let me start with a brief overview of my story. I originally made the decision to pursue law school about a year ago. I pre…
... for it, you could take PT65 and join us for Saturday ... -
BR Group Cycle for October Takers: Starting over, all over againOk, folks. Let's discuss options for BR groups heading towards October. <s>We have two matters to consider:</s> Consideration done! Here's what we…
Hey guys. PT65 BR group will happen TONIGHT at 8pm EST (note time change) -
I think I f***ed up and I want to cancelYou probably didn't. But in case you're feeling this way, I want to say a couple of things before you cancel your score. First of all, congra…
... of which are after like PT65).
The bad news ... -
Videos of Sages doing LSATsI just saw that there was a new video that showed a very good student working through an LSAT logic game in real time, with JY providing color commen…
Sequencing games with a twist.For the people who are taking the 7sage course, and who are on the sequencing games with a twist section, did you attempt to diagram the games before…
... up. For example, PT 21 S1 G4, I am having difficulty ...June 2007.S2.Q17 - hospital executive: at a recent conferencehttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-june-2007-section-2-question-17/ The correct answer choice is B: "[t]he argument relies on the testimony of …
@tytcai89 said:
testimony of experts whose expertise is not shown to be sufficiently broad to support THEIR general claim
Experts. Which experts? Those whose expertise is not shown to be sufficiently broad. Not sufficiently ...Weird Games HighlightThere's been a lot of concern about weird game types appearing or potentially appearing in this era of LSAT. I think it's a healthy concern, and is p…
... elements.
Pt 11-S1-Game 4 (Four apprentices)
Pt 16- S1- Game 4 (Tennis League)
LawgicI've decided to take a break from PTs, and go back over the basics. I think one of my weaknesses is taking the Lawgic that we were taught, and apply…
... even go about diagramming PT29,S1,Q7 if you were asked ...General Logical Indicator QuestionThis might seem a bit silly, but in after doing the translations into lawgic exercise...do we always diagram logic whenever we see it in any LSAT que…
PT64.S1.Q22 - microbiologist: because heavy metalshttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-64-section-1-question-22/ The following is my reasoning for why the answer to PT64S1Q22 is D, and is not B. …
@jac376 said:
Flaw: The correlation of Ra, C, and (C --> Rh) does not mean there is a causation from C to Ra. The answer which strengthens this argument will show that (Rh --> Ra) (C causes Ra because it causes Rh which causes Ra) or directly ...
