HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt65 | 87 | 101 |
| s1 | 1.1K | 1.4K |
| q3 | 67 | 87 |
-
LawgicI've decided to take a break from PTs, and go back over the basics. I think one of my weaknesses is taking the Lawgic that we were taught, and apply…
... even go about diagramming PT29,S1,Q7 if you were asked ... -
General Logical Indicator QuestionThis might seem a bit silly, but in after doing the translations into lawgic exercise...do we always diagram logic whenever we see it in any LSAT que…
PT64.S1.Q22 - microbiologist: because heavy metalshttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-64-section-1-question-22/ The following is my reasoning for why the answer to PT64S1Q22 is D, and is not B. …
@jac376 said:
Flaw: The correlation of Ra, C, and (C --> Rh) does not mean there is a causation from C to Ra. The answer which strengthens this argument will show that (Rh --> Ra) (C causes Ra because it causes Rh which causes Ra) or directly ...Causation LogicCan you conclude from A cause B cause C that A cause C?
Yup, PT65,S4,Q6 is a good example of this. You may think of this in real life as a sort of "indirect cause", but it's causation nonetheless.[Old/Weds] TONIGHT! PT65 BR | 7pm ET<h1> PT65 BR Tonight at 7pm ET</h1> Can you believe we've made it back up to PT65 again??? <center><img src="http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view3/1…
I will be on Saturday call. Didn't we do PT65 already on this past Wednesday?PT 69-S1- Q18 - In order to encourage personalHi all, could someone help me see why B is not supported? The way I see it, the scientist shouldn't be allowed to profit from his technology... But i…
We want an answer that contradicts the stimulus, not one that is irrelevant. The stimulus essentially states that if you’re restricting, then you preventing negative effects. TO contradict that,we negate it: Restricting AND not preventing negative effects. ...February Test BR Groups, Week of Dec. 14th: Weds (PT62), Fri (PT 61), Sat (PT63)Hey Feb Peeps! We got work to do! <img src="http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lvrhzdqhsj1qbi3bk.gif" > </center> <h1>Wednesday, Dec 16th at 8PM E…
Any between PT58-PT65 I have taken and BRed any of those.NA Questions on the Recent Exams.Anyone feel like some of the correct answers to NA questions on the recent exams aren't really necessary? On PT 71,S1, Q22 I see how this would be …
Interesting. You're positive the NA isn't actually necessary? I'm curious about these examples. I didn't look closely at it, but PT 71.S1.Q11 seems to be about pollution. Is that the right reference? PT means PrepTest, right?PT 77 explanationsIs there a ETA on these explanations (77 - Dec 2015) ? Read a post several weeks ago that they would most likely be out before Feb 2016 exam.
The S1 RC explanations are done and the S2 LR ones are in the oven. I'll likely get to S3 LG and the S4 LR next week. Fingers crossed!June Test Takers Group BR Schedule (updated)<img src="http://anticapitalists.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/lets-get-organized-3.jpg" > </center> My fellow June Test-takers! Please take…
... 5pm June LSAT BR Group PT65
Thurs Apr 21, 2016 ...PTB.S1.Q17 - Manners and moralsCan someone help me with this? It is one of the questions where the reasoning for the right answer completely eludes me... The MSS Question basica…
... /> The title does say PTB.S1.Q17? At least it does ...PT32.S1.Q17 - A possible explanation for answer choice CSee here: https://7sage.com/lesson/the-embezzler-weaken-question The Embezzler (weaken EXCEPT question) This question gave a lot of people trou…
@dcdcdcdcdc said:
the likelihood of committing the mistake and the likelihood of committing the crime are separate and distinct from each other.
^ the above is why I highlighted the difference between committing the mistake ...Time Management Curriculum?So I just got to parallel questions in the curriculum, and as I begin working through some of these and time is becoming a more challenging factor th…
You can find JY doing LR in PT69 S1+S4, and PT71 S1+S3. And Jon also had an epic timed LR section video, which took him only 19 minutes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4vY0KpviJw&index=6&list=LLaknkMoRl59wmjfBX67-nFgPT36.S1.Q23 - it is clear that humansHi Everyone, I am having difficulties understanding why Answer E is correct for this LR question. Can someone please explain this to me? <font…
@sunnyp89 - the answers above nail it: more "kinds of lamps" does not explain "more lamps"
And please remove the verbatim question.
Maybe @"Dillon A. Wright" can help with editing out the copyrighted content. The question is PT36, S1, Q23The "Some People Say" Principle [title has been changed!]I have been studying logical reasoning stimuli that include a sentence about what someone OTHER than the author says, usually near the start of the p…
@attorneysomerville said:
PrepTest 63, Section I, Question 8
Wrong question, I think. PT 36.S1.Q08 is about wolves.
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-63-section-1-question-08Repeating LR Stimuli in Different TestsHey everyone, I've been focussed on drilling for the past month, and have realized that many stimuli are used multiple times in different tests, w…
... . This happened for me on S1(LR1) of 76 the Oct ...PT70.S1.Q24 - many homeowners regularly add commercial fertilizershttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-70-section-1-question-24/ I ran into some issues with a LR question on PT 70 S1 and would love some inputs …
@Edmond.Dantes said:
Grass Clips Raked --> Micro Depleted
The stimulus doesn't allow us to conclude this. Grass clippings are one way to get micro-nutrients, but the stimulus doesn't say it's the ONLY way. Thus, when the ...need help with negating sentences for necessary assumptionHello everyone, I seem to be having some issues with negating sentences, some things are very obvious, but others are not. for example 1)The Fine…
... the necessary assumption.
S1: In order for this claim ...PT55.S1.Q25 - some twentieth-century art is greathttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-55-section-1-question-25/ All of the statements follow logically EXCEPT: A. Some influential art involv…
... of stimulus" E.g. PT60.S1.Q7 (P4) - weakened immune system ...Forum RulesHey guys, we have a really awesome community here that's positive and supportive, thank you for that. I hope these simple rules to regulate this d…
... of stimulus" E.g. PT60.S1.Q7 (P4) - weakened immune system ...PT71.S1.Q24 - pediatrician: swollen tonsils give risehttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-71-section-1-question-24/ I can't understand why answer choice 'B' is incorrect! Need some help! The fla…
@LSATKingsman said:
"(B)relies on the assumption" that there "(E)is no other cause for sleeping problems during sleep"
Well, B relies on an assumption that basically assumes the conclusion is already true. The conclusion is ...Relative Support: An Observation/Potential New TrendProps to the BR Group on this, I really kinda just stole this observation from those guys! So there are two questions in PT 78 where it really fee…
What were you guys wavering between in PT78 S1 Q6? I think the question that was the most WTF for me was S3 Q23.
lol but I'm nervous now bc I don't know if I'm seeing the overall trend - WHAT ELSE AM I MISSING?!Super Sayian LSAT !! FrankenLsatI'm currently creating the hardest LSAT ever, I have searched for the hardest game questions, and the hardest Reading Comp questions, now I need help…
... a madman!
PT36 S1 Q21
PT36 S3 Q19 ... /> PT37 S4 Q17
PT40 S1 Q23
PT40 S2 Q16 ...
PT45 S1 Q12
PT45 S4 Q18 ... /> PT62 S2 Q25
PT71 S1 Q20
PT71 S3 Q21 ...PT63.S1.Q14 -- You know those questions that make you rethink everything?This question came up on the last BR group call this Wednesday. I'm really curious what you all think about this question! I'd also love to know what…
@nessa.k13.0 said:
I wrote out a page --a love letter so to speak---for this question in an attempt to give myself the best chance of never making the same mistakes that I did on this question again.
This really is a great ...PT35.S1.Q18 - the current pattern of human consumptionWhy is E wrong? https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-35-section-1-question-18/
Thanks for your response Jonathan, my question was about PT35.S1.Q18. I think a mod edited my post when I originally posted it, and put int he wrong question. I've just seen it and changed it back.Establishing a CorrelationI would appreciate if somebody could clarify this one for me.. https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-72-section-2-question-14/ Here, JY equate…
... the most automatically" in PT47 S1 Q26 does not establish a ...Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the December 2016 LSAT here! Here's some ground rule…
@sd2813 Yeah lots of disagree q's... I found that too.
I had LR-RC-LR-LG-LR.
Found the first two LR's (s1/s3) okay, but after the LG section, I lost my cool for s5 LR.
