All Discussions
HitBox
Word
Docs
Hits
pt65
87
101
s4
1K
1.3K
Related Threads
PT65.S4.Q13 - reducing class sizes
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-65-section-4-question-13/<br /> <br /> I wanted to check my understanding on this question vis. all of your…
PT65.S4.Q23 - dogs are the descendants of domesticated wolves
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-65-section-4-question-23/<br /> <br /> This question has had me stumped for like 3 days! I have done everyt…
PT65.S4.Q26 - because our club recruited the best volleyball players
Hello,<br /> <br /> I'm having trouble understanding why B is incorrect, and why E is the correct answer. <br /> <br /> So originally when going …
PT65.S4.Q11 - prairieview yard size
I understand the flaw in the correct answer choice, but not how it applies to Tom's argument in the stimulus.<br /> <br /> D : "Fails to apply a ge…
PT65.S4.Q22 - Scientist: Physicists claim that their system
This question is still confusing me after watching the explanation. I thought the question stem was Pseudo Sufficient Assumption. <br /> I thought…
LR PT65 S4 BR Session
Would anyone be down to have a BR session next week? I'm looking for maybe one or two people to BR with since I only have a free Zoom account. If som…
PTA.S4.Q3 and PTA.S4.Q5
Okay I had a lot of trouble with these two strengthening questions lol so to see that they are only 2/3 star difficulty is slightly concerning. I end…
PT65.S4.Q22 - Physicists claim that their system of careful peer review...
I have a hard time understanding why C is wrong.<br /> <br /> My case for C is this:<br /> <br /> Why would they need to increase their safeguard…
PT56.S4.P3.Q17 - definition international law national minority
I do not understand the difference between answer choice C and D. How do you suggest that I decipher between two choices that are so close. I tried…
PT58.S4.Q23 - craters high pressure shocks characteristic
Ok..I feel there is just no way I could have got this question. It is a most strengthen question and I feel the answer choice weakens the argument.…
Related Searches
pt 3 s4 q18
52 s4
pt65 s4 23
pt65 s4 q5
pt65 s4 q8
pt65 s4 q21
pt65 s4 q26
pt65 s4 q23
pt65 s4 13
pt65 s4 22
Title Search
@title beer
Word 'beer' in title
User Search
@user admin
Only posts by Admin
Text Search
@body beer
Word 'beer' in the text
Phrase Search
"Hello World"
Exact phrase match
Exclude Terms
car -red
Search cars that are not red
"Or" Searches
honda | bmw
'honda' or 'bmw' results
Multi-Field
@(title,body) hello
Both contain 'hello'
WildCard
hond* civ*
Match all with an astrix
Combination
@title bmw @user admin
See more
supported syntax examples
Search Again :: Adv Search
1000 results in 0.001s
<
1
…
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
>
Memorably difficult sequencing games
Any suggestions would be great
PT68 game 4. Also,
PT65
game 4 has an odd/rare style.
Tavorak_
October 2017
General
Translation of "derive solely from"
I have a question regarding a logical translation of "derive solely from." This is from the answer choice (D) in PT62.S4.Q15. https://7sage.com/lsat_…
... @LSATcantwin !
But PT62.
S4
.Q15 is a PSA question ...
akistotle
October 2017
Logical Reasoning
Translation of "derive solely from"
I have a question regarding a logical translation of "derive solely from." This is from the answer choice (D) in PT62.S4.Q15. https://7sage.com/lsat_…
... /> >
> But PT62.
S4
.Q15 is a PSA question ...
LSATcantwin
October 2017
Logical Reasoning
Score Improvement
Hello All On my LSAT Official Test in September, I got a 152 (my PTs were averaging 155). I am retaking it in December, and I just purchased the …
... /> S3 LG 18/23
S4
RC 12/27 (dang. i ...
Nathaniel
October 2017
General
Score Improvement
Hello All On my LSAT Official Test in September, I got a 152 (my PTs were averaging 155). I am retaking it in December, and I just purchased the …
... LG 18/23
>
S4
RC 12/27 (dang. i ...
Seeking Perfection
October 2017
General
PT22.
S4
.Q19 - contemporary business firms
I could not find anything to prove the conclusion > few people understand current events> and did not see the flaw the LSAT makers identified. He…
Hey, I think you mis-numbered the question. PT22,
S4
, Q19 is a weakening question on the Iron Law of Responsibility.
Could you provide us with the right question number so we could help you out?
thisissparta
November 2017
Logical Reasoning
Weakening questions - a strategy for harder questions?
Yesterday I had the privilege of working through a problem with J.Y. It’s in here if you are curious; https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/1…
... get further clarification for PT82.
S4
.Q14 ?
I've been ...
10000019
November 2017
Logical Reasoning
Delete
Delete
... of one another (i.e.
S4
, Q3). When you have a ...
Mustbe8Characters
November 2017
General
Where could I find the "ridiculously tough" bus game?
Hi everyone, I remember once seeing a bus game which JY refer to as "ridiculously tough." I would like to retried it tonight but I forgot which PT…
PT 36
S4
Game 3
learningphile
December 2017
General
Where could I find the "ridiculously tough" bus game?
Hi everyone, I remember once seeing a bus game which JY refer to as "ridiculously tough." I would like to retried it tonight but I forgot which PT…
> @learningphile said:
> PT 36
S4
Game 3
Thank you.
Artorius
December 2017
General
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LG
Hi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... />
J.Y. treated PT24
S4
Game 1 (https://7sage.com ...
akistotle
December 2017
General
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LG
Hi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... /> > J.Y. treated PT24
S4
Game 1 (https://7sage.com ...
kshutes13
December 2017
General
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LG
Hi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... ; > J.Y. treated PT24
S4
Game 1 (https://7sage.com ...
akistotle
December 2017
General
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LG
Hi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... /> > J.Y. treated PT24
S4
Game 1 (https://7sage.com ...
hihihi9993
December 2017
General
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LG
Hi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... ; > J.Y. treated PT24
S4
Game 1 (https://7sage.com ...
akistotle
December 2017
General
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LG
Hi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... ; > J.Y. treated PT24
S4
Game 1 (https://7sage.com ...
hihihi9993
December 2017
General
Referential phrase: "otherwise"
<center>:warning: <font color="red">**This post contains spoilers to PT80.S4.Q15**</font> :warning:</center> I had trouble parsing out the stimulu…
... in LG; for example, PT55.
S4
.Game 4's last rule ...
akistotle
December 2017
Logical Reasoning
Redacted
Redacted
... involved flawed reasoning (e.g.
S4
.LR1) and were justified as ...
10000019
January 2018
Off-topic
15 Days till February 10 LSAT!
Hey Everyone, With 15 days until the next LSAT -14 days of review time left - I would like to hear the opinion of others on how to spend the next …
... took during that period
PT65
(11/20) 169 (LR1: -2 ...
10000019
January 2018
February 2018 LSAT
LR: You will choose to buy something vs. You will buy something
Hi 7sagers, Is there a difference in the meaning of the statements below? If you see the desk, you will choose to buy the desk. If you see the…
... in the stimulus of PT18/
S4
/Q7. The last sentence is ...
Bumblebee
February 2018
Logical Reasoning
How much harder has RC become in the later tests?
Hey all, Another RC topic here. I've only been drilling from early PT's, PT 35 being the latest. I've only taken full timed PTs from the 30s and …
... (11/14) RC: -3
PT65
(11/20) RC: -7
10000019
February 2018
Reading Comprehension
PT75.
S4
.Q21 (G4)
I don't understand how E can be the correct answer. There actually appears to be no correct answer. The LSAT relies heavily on Formal Logic and apply…
... page.
For PT75.
S4
.Q21 (G4), the [explanation page ...
inactive--->contact @studentservice
February 2018
Logic Games
Videos on Art for Reading Comp better understanding
Hi Guys, I was going through PT1 Reading comp passage. In that JY has recommended to watch some videos on Art if you are unfamiliar with the various…
... /RA2-Vc4PIOY
**PT40
S4
Passage 3**
• What is ...
akistotle
February 2018
Reading Comprehension
Looking for infamous game to practice before make up test
Hi everyone, I am gathering some infamous LGs to practice before the make up test which will happen this Saturday. Base on my own PTs and recom…
... on 1st PT take.
PT65
G4 is a good one ...
twssmith
February 2018
Logic Games
How to go back to curriculum
I recently watched the "Post CC Strategies" webinar and something that he had mentioned as apart of the first phase of taking PTs is that we should b…
... all the questions in PT44.
S4
(Starting from Q1) and PT49 ... .
S4
(Starting from Q1).
: ...
akistotle
February 2018
General
PT28.S1.Q2 - If the economy weak, prices remain constant...
I don't get why answer choices D could be true. Are you not supposed to consider the contrapositives of the answer choices or of what's in the stimul…
... : Souderton or Randsborough" game (PT34.
S4
.Game 4)
https://7sage ...
akistotle
March 2018
Logical Reasoning
PT28.S1.Q2 - If the economy weak, prices remain constant...
I don't get why answer choices D could be true. Are you not supposed to consider the contrapositives of the answer choices or of what's in the stimul…
... : Souderton or Randsborough" game (PT34.
S4
.Game 4)
> https ...
Heart Shaped Box
March 2018
Logical Reasoning
Necessary Assumption Question - are we supposed to throw conditional logic negation out the window
I just want to confirm that when you do the "negation" technique for NA answer choices, you take the common sense version of negation (as in pretty m…
... -na-question/
PT40
S4
Q19
JY actually ...
_oshun1_
March 2018
Logical Reasoning
Necessary Assumption Question - are we supposed to throw conditional logic negation out the window
I just want to confirm that when you do the "negation" technique for NA answer choices, you take the common sense version of negation (as in pretty m…
... /
>
> PT40
S4
Q19
>
> ...
akistotle
March 2018
Logical Reasoning
PT44.
S4
.Q7 - Since empathy is essential for
I am stumped by the question PT44-S4-Q7, and the following is the question: <font color="red">**Admin note:** edited; violation of <a href="https:…
... stumped by the question PT44-
S4
-Q7, and the following is ...
akistotle
March 2018
Logical Reasoning
<
1
…
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
>