* Premise:
- TV news watchers have NO expectations of careful discussion of public issues.
- newspaper readers have the expectation of careful discussion of public issues.
* Conclusion: In contrast to regular newspaper ...
This game was terribly difficult for me, but after spending quite a bit of time thinking about it, I think I've figured out what surely has to be the best way to set this game up. The game seems confusing because it pretends to have 5 game pieces (the five ...
This is a pseudo-sufficient assumption question.
P:All leaders in major parities oppose the bill
C:The bill will most likely fail to pass.
Target answer to connect no support with fail to pass.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-31-section-2-question-21/
This is a parallel flaw question.
Original flaw logic structure:
P1: Bank deposited credited on the same date if it is before 3 pm
P2: Alicia knows the deposit ...
The reason why E doesn't help is because E requires us to go one more step to explain why people aren't wearing seat belts?(because they are not obeying the law?)
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-37-section-2-question-17/
Can anyone help me with these types of questions? It is consistently one of these types that is the only LR question I get wrong, and I haven't been able to find a system to ...
Can someone give me some feed back on this? The reasoning denies a conclusion in order to show a premise is false. Is that an acceptable method of argumentation? I know that conditionally, if A->B, then negation B = negation A, but does that hold true ...
I chose B based on line 3~5 because I think it's the only part about "a book" mentioned in Q27, but the answer is E.
I read the passage twice again, but I still ...
I feel like i am almost there with S.A. questions.
Thank you J.Y.!
But I had some major problems diagraming the conclusion of this question.
Can someone ...
I’ve been struggling with questions like this. It’s clear that the author is using an attack on the character of the writer, but that part where (A) says “as evidence that ...
Hey guys, for those of you who wrote the June LSAT, have you or do you plan to blind review it? I'm thinking about doing that this week - although part of me wants to save it for a re-do closer to the Sept. LSAT.
Anyone can tell me why option D is wrong? Passage A mentions an objection to progressive taxes when it highlights the incentives for avoiding it and the opportunities ...