HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt20 | 65 | 72 |
| s2 | 1.1K | 1.5K |
| q23 | 198 | 217 |
-
PT18.S2.Q23 - teachers are effective only whenHello, Could someone please check my work and let me know if what I have below is correct? I felt like this is a conditional heavy question. It …
... decision in classroom
S2- /Teachers have the power to ... :
[S1] Teachers effective [S2] Enable students to make decision ... be true. S[1] and [S2] are not chained together to ... it is false according to S2
https://7sage. ... -
List of Numbers and Percentages LR QuestionsBelow is a list of LR questions that contain numbers and/or percentages. I'm working through these and I thought I would share. Hopefully this is hel…
... /> PT16, S2, Q9
PT16, S2, Q14
PT16, S2, Q20
PT20, S1, Q24
PT20, S4, Q5
PT20, S4, Q7 ...
PT21, S3, Q3
PT22, S2, Q23
PT22, S4, Q12
PT23, S3, Q16
pt24-s2 ... -
(Spoiler for PT91 included!!) PT91.S2.Q23 help pleaseHi everyone, wondering if i could get your help with Q23 "According to rational-choice theory, popular support"... Would someone be able to help in…
... could get your help with Q23 "According to rational-choice theory ... -
PT56.S2.Q23 - Can anyone explain how this is an illegal reversal to me?<a href="https://www.manhattanprep.com/lsat/forums/q23-ecologist-without-the-intervention-of-t579.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.manhattanprep.com/…
... ://www.manhattanprep.com/lsat/forums/q23-ecologist-without-the-intervention-of ... -
Help with Flaw Type ExamplesHey everyone, I am having a hard time with Flaw Questions. I know we are supposed to memorize the common argument flaws but that is where my struggle…
... )**
PT20.S1.Q10; PT20.S4.Q14; PT30.S2.Q25; PT31.S2.Q9 ; PT64 ... ; PT17.S3.Q20; PT24.S2.Q8; PT49.S2.Q23
**7) Confusing ... .S2.Q11; PT22.S4.Q21; PT23.S2.Q19; PT23.S3.Q17; PT24.S2.Q23 ... ; PT30.S4.Q14; PTJ07.S3.Q25; PT64.S1.Q24; PT67.S2 ... -
Help with Flaw Type ExamplesHey everyone, I am having a hard time with Flaw Questions. I know we are supposed to memorize the common argument flaws but that is where my struggle…
... /> > PT20.S1.Q10; PT20.S4.Q14; PT30.S2.Q25; PT31.S2.Q9 ; PT64 ... ; PT17.S3.Q20; PT24.S2.Q8; PT49.S2.Q23
>
> ... .S2.Q11; PT22.S4.Q21; PT23.S2.Q19; PT23.S3.Q17; PT24.S2.Q23 ... ; PT30.S4.Q14; PTJ07.S3.Q25; PT64.S1.Q24; PT67.S2 ... -
PT46.S2.Q23 - whoever is kind is loved by somebodyI diagrammed it and got K-->LS,O----> H Then for conclusion K--->H when doing all this how do I get to D? I ended up picking E because I knew it co…
I diagrammed it and got K-->LS,O----> H Then for conclusion K--->H when doing all this how do I get to D? I ended up picking E because I knew it couldnt be D (terrible logic i know)
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-46-section-2- ... -
PT6.S2.Q23 - Book Review: When I read a novel set in a cityI was down to A and E, and am having a difficult time understanding why A is incorrect and E is the right answer. Can someone please enlighten me?
I was down to A and E, and am having a difficult time understanding why A is incorrect and E is the right answer.
Can someone please enlighten me? -
PT20.S2.Q25 - the dynamics of apocalypseQ25 Answer Choice (D) states "Draws a conclusion about a specific belief based on responses to queries about two different specific beliefs." What…
Q25 Answer Choice (D) states "Draws a conclusion about a specific belief based on responses to queries about two different specific beliefs."
What does it mean exactly?
And why is it a wrong answer?
Help ... -
PT61.S2.Q23 - every brick house on river street has a front yardhttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-61-section-2-question-23/ So in JY's explanation the stimulus represents invalid argument form 4. But I'm ha…
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-61-section-2-question-23/
So in JY's explanation the stimulus represents invalid argument form 4. But I'm having trouble seeing this. Had the second sentence read "most BRICK houses on river street with front ... -
PT18.S2.Q23 - teachers are effective only whenhttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-2-question-23/ I'm having trouble translating the "not until" statement. Until is "negate suffici…
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-2-question-23/
I'm having trouble translating the "not until" statement. Until is "negate sufficient" but the "not" cancels the negation from the until rule so then it reads just like an if then. Is ... -
PT19.S2.Q23 - a museum director, in order to financehttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-2-question-23/ Can anyone kindly analyze this argument for me?
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-2-question-23/
Can anyone kindly analyze this argument for me? -
PT18.S2.Q23 - teachers are effective only whenhttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-2-question-23/ Here is my conditional reasoning: teachers are effective ------> when they hel…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-2-question-23/
Here is my conditional reasoning:
teachers are effective ------> when they help students become independent learners
teachers have power to make ... -
PT June 2007.S2.Q23 - philosopher: an action is morally right ifI'm not sure why 1) negating morally right to mean morally wrong is incorrect and 2) negating right to mean wrong is incorrect. Please explain! http…
I'm not sure why 1) negating morally right to mean morally wrong is incorrect and 2) negating right to mean wrong is incorrect. Please explain!
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-june-2007-section-2-question-23 -
PT58.S2.Q23 (P4) - in music, a certain complexity of soundHello 7Sage! I have problems for this question. The question stem mentions the preference in Passage A: Preference for coherence connecting va…
Hello 7Sage!
I have problems for this question.
The question stem mentions the preference in Passage A:
Preference for coherence connecting variety, not too simple (pure tone) = not interesting; not too complex = bad
... -
PT34.S2.Q23 - to be horrificI got it right. But I don't know why J.Y said we can can make "some" statement by contrapositive. The relationship is about "all" statement. https:/…
I got it right. But I don't know why J.Y said we can can make "some" statement by contrapositive. The relationship is about "all" statement.
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-34-section-2-question-23/
Any idea？ -
(Theory question) Why do you negate a conditional by negating the necessary?Specifically, I am looking at PT 68.S2.Q23, the second sentence: "We must therefore reject Tolstoy's rash claim that if we knew a lot about the event…
... am looking at PT 68.S2.Q23, the second sentence: "We must ... -
PT9.S2.Q23 - a poor farmer was fond ofSo I got this one wrong and picked C when A is the correct AC. It's just not clicking for me how this is correct. Any help would be greatly appreciat…
So I got this one wrong and picked C when A is the correct AC. It's just not clicking for me how this is correct. Any help would be greatly appreciated! -
PT2.S2.Q23 only question stem shownOnly question stem and all answer choices are shown. No stimulus.
Only question stem and all answer choices are shown. No stimulus. -
PT20.S2.P4 (Q26) - in the dynamics of apocalypseHey everyone! Having a bit of difficulty with this passage. It's from the first RC problem set in the core curriculum. I was wondering if anyone coul…
Hey everyone! Having a bit of difficulty with this passage. It's from the first RC problem set in the core curriculum. I was wondering if anyone could add to JY's explanation for #26 and explain how (E) is supported? I chose (A), but I felt uneasy about ... -
PT9.S2.Q23 - a poor farmer was fond ofThe negation of poor is not poor. The question assumes that you are either rich or else poor. What about the middle class?
The negation of poor is not poor. The question assumes that you are either rich or else poor. What about the middle class? -
PT20.S2.P3 - many birds that form flocksThe whole argument is about SSH mechanism.But I think there is a huge mistake.All the author wants to prove is that the SSH is an independent factor …
The whole argument is about SSH mechanism.But I think there is a huge mistake.All the author wants to prove is that the SSH is an independent factor affecting bird's status.And he did it.The question is that if a juvenile male bird with higher SSH ... -
PT9.S2.Q23 - regarding the logic behind the questionOk so this question gave me a world of trouble. I looked up the explanation given on Manhattan and I think I get it but I need confirmation. My ma…
Ok so this question gave me a world of trouble. I looked up the explanation given on Manhattan and I think I get it but I need confirmation.
My main problem is that the explanation given doesn't seem to use the contrapositive (which I ... -
PT46.S2.Q23 - Whoever is kind is loved by somebodyI was able to get this question right but was not sure about the negation of "anyone". so the negation of anyone is someone??? **Admin note: …
I was able to get this question right but was not sure about the negation of "anyone".
so the negation of anyone is someone???
**Admin note: edited title**
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-46-section-2- ... -
PT9.S2.Q23 - A poor farmer was fondThis question took me a lot of time but i still dont get why A is the answer because in A arent we affirming the consequent which is a conditional lo…
This question took me a lot of time but i still dont get why A is the answer because in A arent we affirming the consequent which is a conditional logic error ( if x then y - all poor then honest ; if y then x - all honest if poor )???
Admin ... -
PT3.S2.Q23 - DNA fingerprintingCan someone explain their reasoning for the right answer? I have a general intuition as to why this is correct, but am having a difficult time articu…
Can someone explain their reasoning for the right answer? I have a general intuition as to why this is correct, but am having a difficult time articulating it to myself. Thanks so much! #HELP -
PT22.S2.Q23: a discussion about the correlation indicatorsFor this question, I conceived the flaw to be"from correlation to causation, and thus to prescriptive assertion". I was threw off by E at my first si…
For this question, I conceived the flaw to be"from correlation to causation, and thus to prescriptive assertion". I was threw off by E at my first sight for its first premise "most people who exercise regularly are able to handle stress."
I ... -
PT81.S2.Q23 - legislation, compromise, no party is satisfiedI chose E and was very confident about it on both timed run and BR. My reasoning was, the first premise is talking about "legislation," and the concl…
I chose E and was very confident about it on both timed run and BR. My reasoning was, the first premise is talking about "legislation," and the conclusion is about a "trade agreement." I thought it was super vague whether a trade agreement should be ... -
PT2.S2.Q23 - NA QuestionHi guys, I've been using the negation test as I go through the answer choices. I've been able to pinpoint why E is correct and why most of the ot…
Hi guys,
I've been using the negation test as I go through the answer choices. I've been able to pinpoint why E is correct and why most of the other answer choices are wrong, except for answer choice C. I don't understand what I'm missing, ...
