I second @"Nilesh S"
I'm pretty sure it would be against rules to post actual screenshots of the stimulus. But if you use referencing such as "PT 35 S1 Q15" and then post your question about it, then it should be alright.
I'm talking about the Misc Category from 7Sage for example PT 40 S1 Q10, Q15. I see now that I can just figure out the type myself. Like Q10 is something like an Identify the Disagreement type.
PT75's not been released (perhaps I should say "published") yet. Just checked Amazon and Cambridge ... Nope! No PT75 anywhere yet. I pre-ordered it from LSAC and it's not here (not been shipped to my knowledge).
@jac376 said:
Flaw: The correlation of Ra, C, and (C --> Rh) does not mean there is a causation from C to Ra. The answer which strengthens this argument will show that (Rh --> Ra) (C causes Ra because it causes Rh which causes Ra) or directly ...
@"Ron Swanson" i think a happy medium would be to do PT75 as an untimed BR. This way you can acquaint yourself with any last minute peculiarities but without the pressure of it being the LAST practice test you're gonna take.