Question stem: would be most helpful to know in order to evaluate the argument?
I am not familiar to this questions stem. Does anyone have strategies in attacking these kind of q's?
Not sure if there are many people who have already solved this PT but would really appreciate the opportunity to pick your brains regarding this question.
I initially chose D. My reasoning was that looking at mortality patterns with other ...
Can someone help me to check if my analysis is right?
Premise:
Two group of fish: one traditionally raised with dull routine and the experimental hatcheries raised in stimulating routine
The experimental hatcheries was bolder ...
I have a quick question about LG 4 on PT 56. I got 3 questions wrong because I misunderstood one of the initial rules -- S cannot take place after any site that includes V.
I wrote it as S --- V even though it was supposed to be S is with ...
Can someone please help me comprehend why "reducing stress can help weakened immune system" is same as "stress can weaken the immune system" ? It seems like invalid negation to me...
I've been having a lot of trouble understanding the explanation behind this game, which is also explained in the curriculum under sequencing games with a twist as the third example.
Hello!
This NA question is causing my blood pressure to rise.
I have trouble accepting E).
Negating E) doesn't destroy the argument. It's okay if medicine DOES reduce stress, as long as it isn't ONLY reducing stress. Maybe it reduces ...
I been drilling the question types. Right now I am at MSS/MBT. However, I came across an error that was reoccuring with me in logic. What do you do when there's two group 4 indicators. For example in PT 10 S.1 People cannot be morally responsible for ...
Hi all!
So long story short, I constantly find myself vacillating between answer choice b and answer choice c. I know what the right answer is _supposed_ to be, but I'm trying to build the road to understanding it myself so that I can replicate it ...
Here is my analysis for question 17 in section 3 for prep test 72. This is a weaken question; therefore, I wanted to weaken the connection between the premises and the conclusion.
Argument Analysis:
This question asks us to find an answer choice that matches the flaw in the stimulus.
The form of the argument in the stimulus and the form of the argument in the correct answer choice are not at all identical, and this is the difficulty ...
#help
Question 10: How do we know that "additives" was ever the cause of behavioral problems in the first place? Researchers being "trained to assess the presence or absence of behavioral problems" does not mean whatever behavioral problems are ...
Can someone explain to me how answer B is the correct one? The sentence the question is asking concerns how cooking has impacted biological evolution; B is about domesticated animals and has nothing to do with cooking?
These questions. DAH.
I went with C for 22 and D for 27. I even got them wrong in BR. I know these questions are pretty weird, but I would love help understanding why the correct answers are correct and why the answers I chose are wrong (though ...
Hi guys. I'm having a hard time understanding why answer D is the correct answer. I understand that the question states what would weaken the Doctor's research study the most, but why is E not a good answer as well? If the study continued with100 more ...
Would somebody please help me. I am having an awfully hard time with the RC questions and I feel that some answer choices can be debated as opinionated.
I am finding the RC questions much harder than the LG.
I struggled between A and B, why is A wrong? and why is B right?
I would think A to be wrong because it focuses the blame on historians, which came from nowhere because the stimulus didn't mention; or even "some great scientists" we don't ...
I cannot understand what the author means by concentrating its resources on areas brought inadvertently within the scope. What does he mean by concentrating resources? Does he mean ...
I'm having trouble understanding question 8 from PT4 section 1. I diagrammed it:
-PWP ---> -GLS and realized that the passage makes an illegal reverse. It should have been GLS ---> PWP (the contrapositive) instead of ...