Like if this were a readingcomprehension passage and the question was asking me about the authors tone. I would answer something like "mild frustration" not "concerned caution" lol
that's pretty strange. you might have got sections swapped around compared to my one. my one starts : 1st SECTION (25), After readingComprehension 2nd Section (26) and after 15 minute break LR (25)
> @tekken1225 said:
>
> My friend who read these things for enjoyment over the course of years, is basically a readingcomprehension savant. Thinks RC in this test is a joke.
...
> I did the CC readingcomprehension as part of the whole ... , and I also started reading Scientific American and The Economist ... do that myself! Has reading Scientific American and the Economist ...
... ; > I did the CC readingcomprehension as part of the whole ... shebang, and I also started reading Scientific American and The Economist ... to do that myself! Has reading Scientific American and the Economist ...
I want a 170 and the thing with blind reviewing. I am writing out why I got the questions I’ve got wrong wrong, but I’m not sure if that’s even helping because I see minimal improvement, especially with readingcomprehension.
What was your studying like prior to the November test? With the January test being less than three weeks away, you're unlikely to make big gains (especially in readingcomprehension).
... answer, resulting in a rushed reading of subsequent passages...and it ... remember that it's called reading "comprehension" --it's about pulling things ...