... if the question was a sufficientassumption question I think that C ... we don't need a sufficient condition, we just need a ... than an argument that is sufficient.
... designation of necessary and sufficient conditions for this statement. The way you ... diagrammed it, with CN as the sufficient ... , because you can deny the sufficient and still have the necessary ...
... that there's some sufficient and necessary assumption confusion because there's ... a sufficientassumption as a necessary assumption" and "treats a necessary assumption as a sufficientassumption ...
... or how little.
-For sufficientassumption, you need to figure out ... sufficient to guarantee that the argument would work.
-For necessary assumption ...
... of all, this is a sufficientassumption question, not a NA, ... br />
If introduces the sufficient condition here (I rephrased costs ... and 2, along with a sufficientassumption, to prove 3:
... /PPBS-->/S, is out sufficientassumption! It allows us to prove ...
... are both classified as Pseudo SufficientAssumption (PSA) questions and there ... the spectrum between strengthening and sufficientassumption questions because the correct answers ... but sometimes less than a sufficientassumption answer. If you classify them ...
... lot of chapters dedicated to Assumption questions, so it clarified everything ... 't missed a Necessary or SufficientAssumption question in 3 PTs, which ...
... truth table. Based on the assumption that NOT is similar logically ... not exist". That means the sufficientassumption that would prove our conclusion ...
... as JY calls them, "Pseudo SufficientAssumption" questions and are more closely ... your run-of-the-mill SufficientAssumption questions. These types of questions ...
... more like a necessary assumption rather than a sufficientassumption? After reading your ... think it really is a sufficientassumption. In order for it to ... be sufficient, don't you need to ...
These are both sufficientassumption questions. In the first question ... , D does satisfy the assumption. But in 63.01.10 ... (D) does not satisfy the assumption.
I would like to know how to diagram Q#19, Sec5 from Sept 2009 LSAT. I've been looking at this question for hours and still don't see how to connect these ideas to make it a sufficientassumption
... in line with how a sufficientassumption question is done, where you ... is a MBT not a sufficientassumption, and the way you are ... solve is a method for sufficientassumption I think.
Yeah I'm still confused. The answer to this question to me reads like a sufficientassumption that is supplied in order to make the conclusion follow logically, not (as the question stipulates) a conclusion that follows logically from the premises.