I was just wondering based upon the question stem, how can you tell if they want to to find the sufficient vs. the necessary assumption and vice versa.
Jon's conditional breakdown shows an example of how the answer choice has to be sufficient based on the argument...
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-55-section-1-question-12/
Hey I am having a tough time with sufficient assumptions for some reason. Did anyone else have a harder time with them and find a resource that really helped? it just isn't clicking yet. Any suggestions? thanks in advance
PT32.S1.Q5 (sufficient assumption question): The new element ... looking for thoughts, corrections, affirmations...whatever you more experienced LSATers can ...
LSAT (sufficient) -->OS (necessary)
... br />
1. The sufficient condition occurs does the necessary ... />
2. Can the sufficient condition occur without the ... happens when you satisfy the sufficient condition?
... difference between a necessary and sufficient "switch" in a flaw question ... that a flaw that mistakes sufficient for necessary is one type ... flaw' of mistaking necessary for sufficient, which we discussed in the ...
... convert any sentence into Sufficient and Necessary conditions sufficient conditions for something or ... makes a sentence a "sufficient sentence" and what makes ... something deliberately is a sufficient condition for deserving praise ...
Someone please explain to me how Sunny is the Necessary Condition and Philadelphia is the Sufficient Condition when both come immediately following the logical indicator of 'always' (Group 2).
So I fell for a sufficient assumption trap, I chose the answer that was basically a restated premise, so for the assumption questions, the answer that is basically a premise, is that always wrong? TYA!