HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| superprep | 226 | 291 |
| a | 136.3K | 436.2K |
| b | 10.1K | 23.1K |
| c | 6.8K | 11.6K |
| and | 133.5K | 409.7K |
| 3560 | 0 | 0 |
| 5813 | 0 | 0 |
| rwgu | 0 | 0 |
-
PTB.S4.Q15 - Why is A the answer and not E?Why is A the answer and not E? **Admin note: edited title; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q#(P#) - [brief description]"**
Why is A the answer and not E?
**Admin note: edited title; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q#(P#) - [brief description]"** -
PT1.S4.Q7 - Is there a way where someone can explain How I got this wrong through the 7sage?The conclusion reached above depends on which one of the following assumptions? (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) The pre-Columbian inhabitants of Mexico p…
... the following assumptions?
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(E ... since its inception
with a rubber ball.
The dating ... -
Is it possible to taken a timed section and blind review through 7Sage?Hello All, I just recently purchased 7Sage and I/m still trying to get accustomed with the program. However, I was wondering if it is possible to…
... /> I just recently purchased 7Sage and I/m still trying to ... LSAT (Let's say a RC section) and then have the ability ... -
In/Out Game with Multiple Necessary Conditions on Tail of Chain<p>Consider this chain:</p> <p>A —> B—> /C or /D</p> <p>I understand Demorgan's Law Regarding Contrapositives. But how do we work with the 'possibl…
Consider this chain:
A —> B—> /C or /D
I understand ... 'If B, then "C not D, or D not C, or Not C not ... negate B?
In my mind, negating B requires BOTH Not C and Not ... can count on NOT BOTH C and D.
Thank you ... -
What is the best way to use the drill function?Hello! I just finished going over the informational videos for LR and wanted to crack down on some drills. I am concerned about using up questions fr…
... the informational videos for LR and wanted to crack down on ... are the PT with letter a (ie. A, B, C) instead of numbers?
Difference b/t sufficient and necessary assumption questions (formal logic)It really helps me understand the concepts of assumption questions by looking at it formally. Could someone check my logic? So say we have a premi…
... .
Instead of (B-->C) (and) (A-->C) --> necessary assumption answer ... /> A-->C
It's evident that A-->B and B-->C implies A ... -->C. That A-->B is a sufficient ...Difference b/t sufficient and necessary assumption questions (formal logic)It really helps me understand the concepts of assumption questions by looking at it formally. Could someone check my logic? So say we have a premi…
... something like {A (and) (A->B) (and) (B->C) (and) C} -> (A->C)
where A is sufficient ... (not) A wouldn't wreck the argument?
(A->B), (B->C) are ... both sufficient and necessary
C is not ...Difference b/t sufficient and necessary assumption questions (formal logic)It really helps me understand the concepts of assumption questions by looking at it formally. Could someone check my logic? So say we have a premi…
... you could say "Well, A-->B isn't really necessary. All ... "It's possible that 'A-->B'" I don't think ... gave
{A (and) (A->B) (and) (B->C) (and) C} -> (A->C)
A and C in the premises ... 't need to "trigger" A or C. All men are mortal, ..…LG help please somebody!I feel kind of hopeless on LG. I've improved since I've been studying, but I figured after a few months I'd have them down, but its not the case. I s…
... medicines A B C D E F G, are you making 5 in and ... ? After doing the games over and over again, you should start ... . It took me more than a few months to get it ... still helps to go back and master the older games.How do I train myself to eliminate the wrong ANSWERS for LRI am having trouble figuring out the hard LR questions. I want to be able to eliminate all the answers that I know are wrong, so I can leave the corr…
... you're doing a MBT and the stimulus says A--> /B. Eliminate an ... logic, such as /A --> B. Mistaken negations and reversals are easy to ... says that due to A, B happened and your goal is to find ... that shows maybe C caused it or that A and B have nothing in ...Help needed! Any tips on maximum/minimum number-type in/out game questions?Hey LSAT Geeks~My test in 10 days and one of my lingering concerns is about the type of in/out game questions that asks "what's the maximum/minimum n…
... :
/A -> B -> C ->/E
and B -> /F ...
D is a ... contrapositive, you have E and A in, B and C out, and you don't know ... B is out and A is in. You can also have C in and E ...Diagramming problemNo A is B until C are both D and E. Since there're two conditional expressions ("No~is~" and "~until~") in one sentence, I'm confused how it makes…
I'll give this a try
No a is b = a-->\b
C are both d and e = c-->d & e
So, a-->\b "until" c--> d & e = [a-->b] --> [c-->d & e]Diagramming problemNo A is B until C are both D and E. Since there're two conditional expressions ("No~is~" and "~until~") in one sentence, I'm confused how it makes…
... are "No A is B" and "C is both D and E". In ... the conditional statements (A -> /B) and (C -> D and E) are the ... looking like this: /(A->/B) -> (C -> D and E)
... a B, then Cs are always Ds and Es.
Contrapositive: /(C ...PT14.S4.Q09 - anyone who supports the new tax planHi! I am having difficulty with predicting descriptive flaw questions. If anyone has done this question can you please explain to me how the correct …
... inferable. Its essentially A->B->C, therefore A->C)
A-> B implies B-> A, we merely need ... B was assumed, and answer choice D says that in our world, A and ~B ... can occur, and if that occurs, ...PT14.S4.Q09 - anyone who supports the new tax planHi! I am having difficulty with predicting descriptive flaw questions. If anyone has done this question can you please explain to me how the correct …
... />
A->~B
A->~C
________
conclusion: ~C -> ~ B
C->~B, since if ~C -> A and A->~B, then ~C->~B.
A->B.>C , therefore A-> C? If it's ...Getting mixed up with failing the sufficient and the necessary.Hey everyone, if someone could give me a quick explanation on failing either the sufficient or necessary I would greatly appreciate it. In LSAT Pre…
... if C is out, then we know B is out and A is ... B---> C. What does this mean? Well, it means A and B are out, and C ... is a floater.
... br /> Try and do something similar for this:
/A ---> B ---> /CWhere is the lesson on negating embedded conditional statements?I just need some clarification now how NOT (A--->B) turns into A and /B.
In (A--->B) ---> C. Couldn't the contrapositive just be
/C---> A--->/B. I am not getting how it gets to /C---> A and /B.Where is the lesson on negating embedded conditional statements?I just need some clarification now how NOT (A--->B) turns into A and /B.
... world and observe A and /B. That proves that A does not lead to B. So A and /B ... :
B->/C.
(A--->B) ---> C means that if ... the conditional relationship of A->B ...Logic Game Set UpI downloaded the Logic Game Cheat Sheet, but what about some language/word indicators of which kind of game it is. Hints, ideas? Appreciate it.
... AND FB→FA
Ex: PROOF:
A→ (B→C)
/A or (B→C)
/A or (/B ... or /C)
(/A or /B) or C
NOT [/A or /B] →C
A and B →C ...Order of Choices for hard LG QuestionsHi All I'm wondering if it's best to start with later answer choices on some of the harder LG questions (rule suspension, 5 IF). Obviously these …
... I would say every answer A,B,C,D,E has its 20 ... some of the LSAT questions and the hardest ones will have ... the correct answer choice as A or B. I wouldn't go ... through all 5 answer choices, and try to eliminate the obvious ...a unless b but only if c.For instance, a -> (b -> c) simplifies to a + -b -> -c. What about (-a -> b) -> c. How can I simplify it?
... proper approach.
(-a->b)->c
because you ... unless=negate sufficient, so negate a and sufficient, then only if= necessary ... well, so (-a->b) servers as the entire sufficient, and then only ...a unless b but only if c.For instance, a -> (b -> c) simplifies to a + -b -> -c. What about (-a -> b) -> c. How can I simplify it?
To simplify: (-a -> b) -> c, think of the expression (-a -> b) as y. That is, y=(-a -> b). Then, we get
y -> c,
or, -c -> -y (taking contrapositive)
or, -c -> (-a -> b)
or, -c AND -a -> ba unless b but only if c.For instance, a -> (b -> c) simplifies to a + -b -> -c. What about (-a -> b) -> c. How can I simplify it?
So,
(A -> B) -> C = not C -> A and not B
(not A -> B) -> C = not C -> not A and not B
A -> (B->C) = A and not B -> C
?a unless b but only if c.For instance, a -> (b -> c) simplifies to a + -b -> -c. What about (-a -> b) -> c. How can I simplify it?
... statement A -> (B->C) = A and not B -> C, the contrapositive should be (B and not C ... ) > not A ...Keeping Track of UnUsed Game PiecesI noticed a common challenge for me is Keeping Track of UnUsed Game Pieces when I'm doing specific game setups. IE I've filled in the pieces based…
... given 7 pieces: A B C D E F G ... out in a straight line like A B C D E ... F G, he always writes them in a ... so:
A B C D
E F ... which entities are used and which ones remain, ... a quick test. Say that you have already used pieces B C E and ...February LSATThis might be an odd question, and I am hoping someone on staff can shed some light on it for me. Does the February test differ from any of the other…
Have you ever done the superprep prep book? with the PT A, B, C? If I remember correctly those are Feb tests (hence ABC rather than #'s) They are just undisclosed so they can recycle for other non-disclosed tests (Sabbath/outside countries)Can I Ditch my PT Books?I currently have every available PT book from LSAC, but am able to return them if I need to. If I upgrade to the 'Ultimate' package, is there any …
Yes. LSAC puts together 3 formerly undisclosed Feb tests and puts them in the Super A, B, C with explanations.embedded conditionalsOk question on this. Lets say we have "if A then no B unless C". According to JY we can diagram as follows: A-->(B-->C) we pull the first term in…
"if A then no B unless C"
From what ... B---> would become B
If A->B->C
If A and B ... ->C < ... br />
Not C-> Not B->not A ?
...LR Study Guides ThreadI was wondering if we could upload our study guides in this post for those taking the June and upcoming LSATs can always come back to this.
... and smart.
LAWGIC
A some B
A some C
________
B ... /> A some C
So all A’s are B’s and some B’s ... are C’s. Which B’s are C ... not A’s and it’s those non-A-B’s that are C’s ...LR Study Guides ThreadI was wondering if we could upload our study guides in this post for those taking the June and upcoming LSATs can always come back to this.
... /> -Validity is a very special relationship between premises and the conclusion. Validity ... has compassion. (A → C)
A→ B → C
____________
A → C
and forces it down into the ...
