Hey guys, does anyone have any suggestions on recognizing when an argument is causal when it does not include key words like "responsible for", "resulted in", or straight up "caused"?
I'm seeing question 22 on on Section 2 in PT 73 being ...
... a conceptual framework for analyzing arguments. I believe this helped ... on 7sage, we look at arguments from the 'vertical' model ... started to also look at arguments as such:**
... />
As we know, arguments are PREMISES ––> CONCLUSION.
... of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the ... to assume each one is valid or true. It is our ... comes close to creating a valid argument is great, but, it ...
What is the primary difference between Necessary Assumption Qs and Sufficient Assumption Qs? Both are required to make the argument valid but I'm not quire sure how the answer choices differ.
... a probabilistic outcome can be valid if it is most likely ... could this actually be a valid argument so to speak? [This ... a probabilistic outcome being potentially valid)].