^ This. There's also a whole section on 7sage where J.Y goes over valid/invalid argument forms with intersect statements. It has really helped me with the confusing most/some relationships.
@Seglen512, I was wondering the same thing! I really want to avoid having to ask for reference letters all over again...have you been able to find out if they'll stay valid?
I feel that the easiest way to memorize these forms is to actually make flash cards and go over them a couple of times. I did this about 5 times in a row & I was able to recognized all valid & invalid forms afterwards.
Yes! Make sure you memorize those lessons! They will be very helpful soon, especially once you get to PTs. Also, valid and invalid argument types. CRUCIAL information to memorize and know when to spot it out.
... . They introduce both premises and conclusions. But, you just have to ... the rest are just sub-conclusions, otherwise known as major premises ... out what the premises and conclusions are in the other person ...
Parallel Method ... />
Necessary Assumption Questions
- A valid argument encompasses every single NA ... in a way that is valid, all NA included are: you ...
... . They introduce both premises and conclusions. But, you just have to ... the rest are just sub-conclusions, otherwise known as major premises ... out what the premises and conclusions are in the other person ...
The valid argument forms and the existential quantifiers can appear anywhere on the LSAT, not only in particular types of questions. Sure, they may appear more frequently in certain types of questions, but it's not a hard and fast rule.
... .
2. premises and intermediate conclusions that support the main conclusion ... terms that indicate premises and conclusions, etc.) This will be key ...