HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| 51 | 356 | 443 |
-
How long did it take you to get through the Core Curriculum?All, I'm new to 7SAGE. I haven't started PT'ing yet. I am going through the course curriculum first. How long did it take you to get through the c…
... /Actual-Official-LSAT-PrepTests-42-51/dp/0986086290/ref=sr_1_2?ie ... -
A Number Of - Some or Most?Title says it all. I'm having trouble finding an answer through Google.
... "Most" could mean anything from 51%-100%.
Instead of ... -
Did 7sage change the way it does elimination questions and the order it does "if" questions"?I noticed that they started going to the elimination question right after each individual rule rather than doing it after going through the rules as …
... to the videos for PT50, 51, 52, etc. you may see ... -
Help with a simple translationI'm working on translations to help with my SA understanding and am using the "find the missing link" exercises by taking the logic and translating t…
... speaking for a range of 51 to 100, so we can ... -
Approach to extra practice without question bankHi Everyone! So I just got 7sage and it's really wonderful, but I only got the starter pack that gives me limited access to the question bank. I d…
... the 10 actual bundles - 42-51, 52-61,62-71. You ... -
List of affordable PTs (paperback/hard copy)<strong>Update Feb 2017: printable e-docs for the LSAT questions are now included in 7Sage materials.</strong> There is also a list here: http://…
> @"Dillon A. Wright" said:
> Added @nshamoon565 's link for 42-51!
Hi,Dillon,do you know where I can buy PT39-41? -
Study group for September/December LSAT?Hi everyone, is there a study/blind review group for those prepping to take the test in September or December? If not, can we start one? The support …
... break currently have PT 49-51 AND 62 TO current. -
Burn Out?Hi all I was wondering if anyone else had this experience. I just finished the PT's from PT's 42-51 (the red book) and I was averaging about 18-20 on…
... 's from PT's 42-51 (the red book) and I ... -
Some statementsHey im still confused after reviewing the CC again I know a some statement can be reversibly read but is there a way to negate it? For example:…
I look at a statement plus its negation as encompassing 0 to 100. So most is from 51 to 100. Therefore not most is from 0-50. -
Some statementsHey im still confused after reviewing the CC again I know a some statement can be reversibly read but is there a way to negate it? For example:…
... " half plus one rather than 51 to account for something like ... debatable. jk, of course.
51 Pegasi b? planet.
Pluto ... -
Can I treat "few" as same as "some" and "many"?Remember in "Some and Most Relationship" lesson, JY mentions that "some" and "many" can be used interchangeably because they both have subjective def…
... 's so because most is 51~100 whereas few is 2 ... -
Can I treat "few" as same as "some" and "many"?Remember in "Some and Most Relationship" lesson, JY mentions that "some" and "many" can be used interchangeably because they both have subjective def…
... 's so because most is 51~100 whereas few is 2 ... -
Can I treat "few" as same as "some" and "many"?Remember in "Some and Most Relationship" lesson, JY mentions that "some" and "many" can be used interchangeably because they both have subjective def…
... that lower-bound begins at 51, but that's all we ... -
Digital LSAT ResultsI'm on the road so I can't post the full write up, but for those of you who took the digital LSAT, I just got an email with the results. Go check it …
Differences in PT scores?Hello, I just restarted my full length practice after a while, scored a 164 for pt 52 last week and 172 for pt 51 this week (WTH)..I was also sick…
i can tell you for sure that it's not difference in level of difficulty. I got destroyed in PT 51(especially LR sec 3. I even remember the section number: that's how hard i got rekt), while doing much better on other ones.PT20.S2.P4 (Q26) - in the dynamics of apocalypseHey everyone! Having a bit of difficulty with this passage. It's from the first RC problem set in the core curriculum. I was wondering if anyone coul…
... better data. That is lines 51-53. Our author then concludes ..."Mathy" Questions drilling?Sharing this in hopes that it might be useful to some: In an effort to feel more comfortable with "mathy" questions (involving proportions, percen…
... , S4, #22 (36)
PT 51, S1, #4 (10)
PT ... 51, S1, #18 (14)
PT 51, S3, #4 ...PTingHi, I am planning to write the LSAT this September. I had taken my first diagnostic in early May and had scored 143. After preparing with the LSAT…
... your hands on PTs 42-51 and the earlier if you ...For those of you who scores 170+ on PT 70s .
One interesting approach I have heard is to take the PTs out of order. For example, 51, 61, 71, 52, 62, 72, etc, etc. That will give you exposure to the newer tests and their differences without burning through them.For those of you who scores 170+ on PT 70s .
... out of order. For example, 51, 61, 71, 52, 62, 72 ...It works!I just finished grading PT71,(drumroll), i got a 173!!! And a 178 BR. Got that little email from JY and Dillon. Stick to the BR, be intense in the r…
... from 20-50
And 51 till 80 are for full ...'Best of J.Y. moments:' J.Y.'s video explanations that just make your day.I just came across [this explanation](https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-4-question-18/) and I realized how much J.Y.'s humor has ha…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-3-question-23/
he says we have been abused by the test writers hahahaha. it's true, but he does say it's not in bad intentions... I don't believe him!!!! xDAdding a 5th sectionHi, I was wondering if most of you add a 5th section to your PTs, and if so do you take those sections from unseen PTs or from old ones?
... /> I might use PTs 42-51 for all my experimental sections ..."Almost All"Hey All, Logically, what does "almost all" translate to? It seems that it should be more restrictive than "most", but I'm not completely certain. …
@AllezAllez21 That was my initial thought too but "most" translates to 51%-100%.
Almost all excludes the possibility of 100% and it seems unlikely that 51% could be considered "almost all"...doesn't it?"Almost All"Hey All, Logically, what does "almost all" translate to? It seems that it should be more restrictive than "most", but I'm not completely certain. …
... restrictive lower bound. So if 51/100 dentists agree on X ..."Almost All"Hey All, Logically, what does "almost all" translate to? It seems that it should be more restrictive than "most", but I'm not completely certain. …
... restrictive lower bound. So if 51/100 dentists agree on X ...
