The example given on the cheat sheet states, No candy is bitter.
pick either idea and negate it right?
what about No candy? doesn't that mean candy is negated?
so instead of C arrow /B shouldn't it be /C arrow /B?
So if I had this statement: No candy is bitter. NO(C-->B) meaning C-->/B could that translate to C and /B. You can have candy and it not be bitter. Is that right? I think I am over thinking it a lot...
The contrapositive is: Bitter ----> NOT ...
So if a substance is bitter, you know that it cannot ... have a candy that is bitter, because of the definition ...
Thanks a lot @"Ron Swanson" @LSATisland and @"Nicole Hopkins" your response has been of great help in making my decision to withdraw. Looking forward to the bitter sweet LSAT journey with my fellow 7Sagers :)