Almost every hard Logical Reasoning question hides a conditional, and the test wins when "only if," "unless," and "no X without Y" stop sounding like the plain "if–then" they actually are. Logic Links trains the one move that defuses all of them: seeing when two differently worded statements say the same conditional—and when a tiny rewording secretly reverses it.

How it works. You get a grid of 16 short statements. Hidden inside are four groups of four, and every statement in a group means the same conditional: the original, its contrapositive, and natural-language paraphrases. Pick four, submit, and lock in the group. You have four mistakes. Get three of four right and you'll see "one away," along with exactly why the impostor fooled you.

The trap is the lesson. Every board hides two pairs of mirror-image groups: one where an idea is necessary ("only if," "unless," "without") and one where it's treated as sufficient ("if," "whenever," "is enough"). Mixing them up is affirming the consequent, the most common conditional error on the LSAT, and Logic Links turns telling them apart into a reflex.

A fresh puzzle every day. The daily puzzle is the same for everyone and gets harder as the week goes on—Monday is gentle, Sunday is brutal. Share your grid to compare with your study group, or open the archive to play any past day. Want a tough one? Grab a Friday, Saturday, or Sunday.

Leave feedback