LSAT 111 – Section 3 – Question 23

LSAT 111 - Section 3 - Question 23

October 2001

You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.

Request new explanation

Target time: 1:31

This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds

Question
QuickView		 Type Tags Answer
Choices		 Curve Question
Difficulty		 Psg/Game/S
Difficulty		 Explanation
PT111 S3 Q23
+LR
+Exp
Most strongly supported +MSS
Net Effect +NetEff
Math +Math
A
1%
156
B
4%
162
C
12%
160
D
81%
168
E
2%
158
147
154
162
 +Harder 147.206 +SubsectionMedium

Tony: A new kind of videocassette has just been developed. It lasts for only half as many viewings as the old kind does but costs a third as much. Therefore, video rental stores would find it significantly more economical to purchase and stock movies recorded on the new kind of videocassette than on the old kind.

Anna: But the videocassette itself only accounts for 5 percent of the price a video rental store pays to buy a copy of a movie on video; most of the price consists of royalties the store pays to the studio that produced the movie. So the price that video rental stores pay per copy would decrease by considerably less than 5 percent, and royalties would have to be paid on additional copies.

Summary

In light of Tony’s conclusion that the new kind of videocassette tape would be significantly more economical to video rental stores, Anna claims that the videocassette tape itself only accounts for 5 percent of the total price paid by video rental stores for a copy of a movie. Most of the price video rental stores pay for each videocassette tape consists of royalties, therefore the price video rental stores will pay per tape would decrease considerably less than 5 percent.

Strongly Supported Conclusions

The new kind of videocassette tape would not be significantly more economical for video rental stores.

A
The royalties paid to movie studios for movies sold on videotape are excessively large.

We don’t know whether Anna believes the royalties paid to movie studios are excessively large. We only know that royalties account for the majority of the price per videotape copy.

B
Video rental stores should always stock the highest-quality videocassettes available, because durability is more important than price.

We don’t know what Anna believes video rental stores should do.

C
The largest part of the fee a customer pays to rent a movie from a video rental store goes toward the royalties the store paid in purchasing that movie.

We don’t know what a customer’s fees for renting a movie pay for. Anna states that most of the price video rental stores pay for a videotape go toward royalties, but we don’t know what portion of customers’ rental fees cover those royalties.

D
The cost savings to video rental stores that buy movies recorded on the cheaper videocassettes rather than movies recorded on the more durable ones will be small or nonexistent.

Anna believes that switching to the new kind of videocassette tape will not be significantly more economical for video rental stores, since the cost of the tape itself is only a small fraction of the price rental stores pay per copy.

E
If the price a video rental store pays to buy a movie on videocassette does not decrease, the rental fee the store charges on the movie will not decrease.

We don’t know what factors would cause video rental fees to increase, decrease, or stay the same.

Take PrepTest

Review Results

LSAT PrepTest 111 Explanations

Section 1 - Logical Reasoning

Section 2 - Reading Comprehension

Section 3 - Logical Reasoning

Section 4 - Logical Reasoning

Get full LSAT course

Leave a Reply