LSAT 16 – Section 1 – Game 1
LSAT 16 - Section 1 - Game 1
September 1995We regret to inform you due to forces beyond our control these LG explanation videos are no longer freely available. For more information, please see 7Sage Forum or Reddit.
The full set of LG explanation videos are only available to students with the LSAT course.
You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.
Target time: 11:17
First sentence of question: Eight new students-R, S, T, V, W, X, Y, Z-are being divided among exactly three classes-class 1, class 2, and class 3.
Question keywords: eight, new, students, R, S, T, V, W, X, Y, Z, divided, three, classes, class 1, class 2, class 3
This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds
Question QuickView |
Type | Tags | Answer Choices |
Curve | Question Difficulty |
Psg/Game/S Difficulty |
Explanation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PT16 S1 Q01 |
+LG
| Grouping +GrpPure | A
1%
150
B
1%
160
C
1%
158
D
97%
167
E
1%
159
|
120 130 141 |
+Easiest | 0 +SubsectionEasier | Explanation |
PT16 S1 Q02 |
+LG
| Grouping +GrpPure | A
1%
158
B
0%
157
C
1%
160
D
2%
157
E
96%
167
|
123 134 144 |
+Easiest | 0 +SubsectionEasier | Explanation |
PT16 S1 Q03 |
+LG
| Grouping +GrpPure | A
84%
168
B
3%
156
C
3%
160
D
8%
160
E
2%
160
|
139 149 160 |
+Medium | 0 +SubsectionEasier | Explanation |
PT16 S1 Q04 |
+LG
| Grouping +GrpPure | A
1%
156
B
1%
158
C
1%
156
D
1%
158
E
95%
167
|
127 137 147 |
+Easier | 0 +SubsectionEasier | Explanation |
PT16 S1 Q05 |
+LG
| Grouping +GrpPure | A
1%
159
B
5%
156
C
86%
168
D
4%
157
E
5%
161
|
141 150 159 |
+Medium | 0 +SubsectionEasier | Explanation |
PT16 S1 Q06 |
+LG
| Grouping +GrpPure | A
3%
160
B
4%
159
C
3%
162
D
80%
168
E
9%
165
|
130 147 164 |
+Medium | 0 +SubsectionEasier | Explanation |
Note: At 1:30, I made a mistake calling the rule a bi-conditional. If it were a bi-conditional, then /Y→S. That’s just not true. /Y doesn't trigger S.
The correct interpretation of the rule is just a straight up "not both" rule, S→/Y.
Thanks to the 7Sagers who pointed this out.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment. You can get a free account here.