LSAT 16 – Section 1 – Game 1
We regret to inform you due to forces beyond our control these LG explanation videos are no longer freely available. For more information, please see 7Sage Forum or Reddit.
The full set of LG explanation videos are only available to students with LSAT Ultimate+.
You need LSAT Premium or higher course to see this video. Enroll now in less than a minute.
Target time: 7 minutes
First sentence of question: Eight new studentsR, S, T, V, W, X, Y, Zare being divided among exactly three classesclass 1, class 2, and class 3.
Question keywords: eight, new, students, R, S, T, V, W, X, Y, Z, divided, three, classes, class 1, class 2, class 3
This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics  all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds
Question QuickView 
Type  Tags  Answer Choices 
Curve  Question Difficulty 
Psg/Game/S Difficulty 
Explanation 

PT16 S1 Q01 
+LG
 Grouping  Pure +GrpPure  A
1%
150
B
1%
160
C
1%
157
D
97%
168
E
1%
160

120 127 139 
+Easiest  0 +SubsectionEasiest  Explanation 
PT16 S1 Q02 
+LG
 Grouping  Pure +GrpPure  A
1%
158
B
0%
158
C
0%
162
D
2%
155
E
97%
168

124 134 143 
+Easiest  0 +SubsectionEasiest  Explanation 
PT16 S1 Q03 
+LG
 Grouping  Pure +GrpPure  A
84%
169
B
3%
155
C
3%
163
D
9%
161
E
1%
163

139 150 160 
+Medium  0 +SubsectionEasiest  Explanation 
PT16 S1 Q04 
+LG
 Grouping  Pure +GrpPure  A
1%
156
B
1%
167
C
1%
153
D
1%
158
E
96%
168

127 137 146 
+Easier  0 +SubsectionEasiest  Explanation 
PT16 S1 Q05 
+LG
 Grouping  Pure +GrpPure  A
0%
159
B
4%
155
C
87%
169
D
3%
157
E
6%
162

140 149 158 
+Medium  0 +SubsectionEasiest  Explanation 
PT16 S1 Q06 
+LG
 Grouping  Pure +GrpPure  A
3%
159
B
4%
160
C
3%
162
D
82%
169
E
9%
165

131 147 163 
+Medium  0 +SubsectionEasiest  Explanation 
Note: At 1:30, I made a mistake calling the rule a biconditional. If it were a biconditional, then /Y→S. That’s just not true. /Y doesn't trigger S.
The correct interpretation of the rule is just a straight up "not both" rule, S→/Y.
Thanks to the 7Sagers who pointed this out.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment. You can get a free account here.