LSAT 52 – Section 2 – Game 4

LSAT 52 - Section 2 - Game 4

September 2007

We regret to inform you due to forces beyond our control these LG explanation videos are no longer freely available. For more information, please see 7Sage Forum or Reddit.

The full set of LG explanation videos are only available to students with LSAT Ultimate+.

You need LSAT Ultimate+ to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.

Target time: 8:33

First sentence of question: A bread truck makes exactly one bread delivery to each of six restaurants in succession—Figueroa's, Ginsberg's, Harris's, Kanzaki's, Leacock's, and Malpighi's.

Question keywords: bread, truck, bread, delivery, six, restaurants, figueroa's, ginsberg's, harri's, kanzaki's, leacock's, malpighi's, earlier, later

This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds

Question
QuickView		 Type Tags Answer
Choices		 Curve Question
Difficulty		 Psg/Game/S
Difficulty		 Explanation
PT52 S2 Q18
+LG
Sequencing - Conditional rules +SeqCond
A
2%
157
B
9%
157
C
86%
164
D
1%
156
E
1%
153
136
146
156
 +Medium 0 +SubsectionMedium Explanation
PT52 S2 Q19
+LG
Sequencing - Conditional rules +SeqCond
A
92%
163
B
2%
156
C
2%
157
D
2%
155
E
2%
159
129
140
151
 +Easier 0 +SubsectionMedium Explanation
PT52 S2 Q20
+LG
Sequencing - Conditional rules +SeqCond
A
4%
158
B
15%
159
C
4%
156
D
2%
155
E
75%
165
144
153
163
 +Harder 0 +SubsectionMedium Explanation
PT52 S2 Q21
+LG
Sequencing - Conditional rules +SeqCond
A
3%
157
B
2%
156
C
88%
164
D
5%
157
E
2%
159
137
146
156
 +Medium 0 +SubsectionMedium Explanation
PT52 S2 Q22
+LG
Sequencing - Conditional rules +SeqCond
A
11%
159
B
8%
159
C
64%
165
D
8%
158
E
8%
161
148
159
169
 +Harder 0 +SubsectionMedium Explanation
PT52 S2 Q23
+LG
Sequencing - Conditional rules +SeqCond
A
5%
158
B
6%
158
C
8%
159
D
11%
159
E
70%
165
147
157
166
 +Harder 0 +SubsectionMedium Explanation

At 1:27, J.Y. meant to say “ if M if before F ” (not “if M if before H”).

Take PrepTest

Review Results

LSAT PrepTest 52 Explanations

Section 2 - Logic Games

Get full LSAT course

Leave a Reply