A ring of gas emitting X-rays flickering 450 times per second has been observed in a stable orbit around a black hole. In light of certain widely accepted physical theories, that rate of flickering can best be explained if the ring of gas has a radius of 49 kilometers. But the gas ring could not maintain an orbit so close to a black hole unless the black hole was spinning.

Summary

Scientists have seen a ring of gas that maintains a stable orbit around a black hole. The gas ring emits X-rays that flicker 450 times per second. This flickering speed suggests that the gas ring has a radius of 49 kilometers, meaning that it is very close to the black hole. However, for the gas ring to maintain its orbit so close to the black hole, the black hole itself must be spinning.

Strongly Supported Conclusions

In some conditions, gas can orbit black holes at a close distance.

The black hole is spinning.

A
Black holes that have orbiting rings of gas with radii greater than 49 kilometers are usually stationary.

This is unsupported. We know only that black holes that have orbiting rings of gas with radii of 49 kilometers must be spinning. We do not know the conditions of black holes that have orbiting rings of gas with radii greater than 49 kilometers.

B
Only rings of gas that are in stable orbits around black holes emit flickering X-rays.

This is unsupported. The stimulus only tells us about this particular ring of gas. We do not have any information about the emissions of any other rings of gas.

C
The black hole that is within the ring of gas observed by the astronomers is spinning.

This is strongly supported. We know that the gas ring has been observed in a stable orbit very close to the black hole. Because the ring can only maintain such a close orbit if the black hole is spinning, we can conclude that the black hole is spinning.

D
X-rays emitted by rings of gas orbiting black holes cause those black holes to spin.

This is unsupported. The stimulus tells us that the black hole must be spinning based on the observed facts of the gas ring. However, it does not tell us what causes the black hole to spin.

E
A black hole is stationary only if it is orbited by a ring of gas with a radius of more than 49 kilometers.

This is unsupported. We know only that a black hole orbited by a gas ring with a radius of 49 kilometers must not be stationary. We do not know the conditions required for a black hole to be stationary.


36 comments

Human beings can live happily only in a society where love and friendship are the primary motives for actions. Yet economic needs can be satisfied in the absence of this condition, as, for example, in a merchant society where only economic utility motivates action. It is obvious then that human beings _______.

Summary

People must live in a society primarily motivated by love and friendship in order to be happy. However, their economic needs can still be met outside of such a society. For example, humans’ economic needs can be met in a society that’s just motivated by economic utility.

Strongly Supported Conclusions

Human beings can have their economic needs met and still be unhappy.

Human beings cannot be happy in a society motivated primarily by economic utility.

A
can live happily only when economic utility is not a motivator in their society

This is unsupported. The stimulus says that love and friendship must be the primary motivators of a society in order for people to be happy. As far as we know, economic utility can still be one of the society’s motivators, it just must not be the primary motivator.

B
cannot achieve happiness unless their economic needs have already been satisfied

This is unsupported. The satisfaction of economic needs is not presented as necessary for happiness. Rather, a society motivated by love and friendship is necessary. Perhaps one could live in a society motivated by love, be economically unsatisfied, and still be happy.

C
cannot satisfy economic needs by means of interactions with family members and close friends

This is unsupported. The stimulus does not give us any information about whether a person can or cannot satisfy their economic needs through family and friends. We only know that economic needs can be satisfied in a society “where only economic utility motivates action.”

D
can satisfy their basic economic needs without obtaining happiness

This is strongly supported. Humans must live in a society primarily motivated by love and friendship in order to obtain happiness. Humans can satisfy their basic economic needs outside of such a society. Thus, humans can satisfy their economic needs without obtaining happiness.

E
cannot really be said to have satisfied their economic needs unless they are happy

This is anti-supported. The stimulus tells us that humans can satisfy their economic needs in a society primarily motivated by economic utility. In such a society, people are not happy. So a person does not need to be happy in order to be economically satisfied.


9 comments

Technologically, it is already possible to produce nonpolluting cars that burn hydrogen rather than gasoline. But the national system of fuel stations that would be needed to provide the hydrogen fuel for such cars does not yet exist. However, this infrastructure is likely to appear and grow rapidly. A century ago no fuel-distribution infrastructure existed for gasoline-powered vehicles, yet it quickly developed in response to consumer demand.

Summarize Argument
The infrastructure for hydrogen-powered cars is likely to grow quickly, even though it doesn’t exist yet. This is because, just as gas stations expanded rapidly when gasoline-powered vehicles became popular, we expect hydrogen fuel stations will follow the same pattern.

Identify Conclusion
The fuel infrastructure for hydrogen-powered cars will likely develop and expand quickly.

A
It is already technologically possible to produce nonpolluting cars that burn hydrogen rather than gasoline.
This is context. It provides background information on the current feasibility of hydrogen-powered cars and sets the stage for the author's argument that the fuel-distribution infrastructure for these cars will likely develop quickly.
B
The fuel-distribution infrastructure for hydrogen-powered cars still needs to be created.
This is context. The need to create a fuel infrastructure for hydrogen-powered cars sets the stage for the author's argument that such infrastructure will develop and expand quickly.
C
If a new kind of technology is developed, the infrastructure needed to support that technology is likely to quickly develop in response to consumer demands.
This is an unstated premise. The author assumes that, like the rapid development of fuel infrastructure for gas-powered cars, the same will happen for hydrogen-powered cars because the infrastructure needed to support new technologies quickly develops due to consumer demands.
D
The fuel-distribution infrastructure for hydrogen-powered cars is likely to appear and grow rapidly.
This captures the argument's main conclusion. The stimulus concludes that "this infrastructure"—referring to the fuel infrastructure needed for hydrogen-powered cars—"is likely to appear and grow rapidly," which this answer choice correctly restates.
E
Hydrogen-powered vehicles will be similar to gasoline-powered vehicles with regard to the amount of consumer demand for their fuel-distribution infrastructure.
The stimulus doesn't make this argument. It concludes that consumer demand will drive the growth of hydrogen fuel infrastructure, similar to gasoline, but it doesn't claim that both will have the same level of demand—only that each has enough to spur rapid infrastructure growth.

15 comments