In practice the government will have the last word on what an individual's rights are, because its police will do what its officials and courts say. βββ ββββ ββββ βββ ββββ ββββ βββ ββββββββββββ ββββ ββ βββββββββββ βββ βββββββ βββββ ββββββ βββ ββββββ ββ ββ ββββ βββββββ ββββ βββββββ ββββ ββββ ββββ βββββ ββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββββ βββββββ ββ ββββββ βββββ βββββ ββββ ββββ ββββ ββ βββββ ββββββ ββ ββββ
The governmentβs determination of an individualβs rights isnβt necessarily correct. This is supported through conditional logic: If the governmentβs view is correct, then people only have the moral rights that the government chooses to grant; if people only have the moral rights the government chooses to grant, then people do not have moral rights. Thus, the governmentβs view is not necessarily correct. This argument rests on the assumption that people do have moral rights.
The conclusion puts a limitation on government correctness in determining individual right: βThat does not mean that the governmentβs view is necessarily the correct view.β
Analysis by TiaraLaulusa
Which one of the following ββββ ββββββββββ βββββββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββ
Individuals have no ββββββ ββ βββ ββββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββ ββββ ββββ βββ
What government officials βββ ββββββ βββ ββ ββββββββββββ ββββββ βββ βββ βββ ββ ββββββββ
Individuals have rights ββββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββ ββββ ββββ ββ ββββ
The police always βββββ ββββ ββββββββββ βββββββββ βββ βββ ββββββ βββββ ββββ ββ ββββββββββββ ββββββ ββββ
One should always βββ ββ ββββββ βββββ ββββββββββ ββββββ βββββββ βββ ββββββββββββ ββββ ββ ββββ βββββ ββββββ ββββ