Conclusion Perception cannot be a relationship between a conscious being and a material object that causes that being to have beliefs about that object. ███ █████ ███ ████ █████████████ ████████ ███████ █████ █████ ██ ████ ████████
This argument makes a case for why a word (“perception”) can’t be defined a certain way (as “a relationship between a conscious being and a material object that causes that being to have beliefs about that object”) by stating that the definition of the word would share characteristics with an antonym of that word (“imperceptible”).
Just because someone gives a word a definition that shares characteristics with an antonym of that word, it doesn’t necessarily mean that the definition is wrong. It’s possible for two things that are opposites to share similarities.
Which one of the following ██ ████ ███████ ████████ ██ ███ ██████ █████████ ██ ███ ██████ █████████ ██ ███ ████████ ██████
Art cannot be ██ ████████ ███████ ██ ███████ ████ ███ ███████ ███████ ██ ███████ ██ █████████ ████████ ██ ███ █████████ ███ ██ █████ ████ █████████ █████████ ██ █████████ ████ ███ ███ ████
Liberty cannot be ███ ██████████ ██ █████ ██████ ███ ██ ███████ ███ ████ █████ ██ ███ ███████ ███ ██ ██████ ████ ███ █████ ██ ██ ████ ██████ ████ ███ ██ ███████ ███
Preparation cannot be ██████ ████████ ██████ ██████████ █████ ███ ███████ ████████ ██████ ████ ██████ ███ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ██████ ████ ██ ██████ ██ ███████████ ████ █████
Happiness cannot be ███ █████ ██ ████ ██ █████ ████████ ████ █████████████ ███ ██████████████ ████████████ ████ █████ ███ ██ ██████ ██████ ███████ ████ ███ ████████ ██████████████
Physics cannot be ███ ███████ ████ ████████████ ███ ████████ ██████████ ██ ███████ ███ █████ ██████ ███ ███████ ███ ███ ████████ ██████████ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██████ ███████