This is too strong to support. The analogous argument in the stimulus suggests that a public servant should not rely solely on public opinion. It does not imply that they should completely disregard it.

The stimulus does not say anything to support a comparison between an average public servant and the average person.

Nothing in this analogous argument directly suggests that a public servant should be more knowledgeable. It is only about who they should not rely on when making decisions.

This follows the analogous argument perfectly by emphasizing that public servants, like those with serious medical conditions, should not rely on those without expertise when making decisions.

There is nothing in this argument about the conditions that make one a good public servant. The stimulus is about decision-making, not what makes a good public servant.