PT129.S2.Q18 > Question

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 2 · lr

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5

PASSAGE 2

Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12

PASSAGE 3

Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19

PASSAGE 4

Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

If one has a serious medical condition, they would not rely on the average person to prescribe their treatment. Similarly, since a good public servant has the interest of the public at heart… (the right answer will be the conclusion)

A good public servant should not rely on an average person to make decisions about the public.

This is too strong to support. The analogous argument in the stimulus suggests that a public servant should not rely solely on public opinion. It does not imply that they should completely disregard it.

The stimulus does not say anything to support a comparison between an average public servant and the average person.

Nothing in this analogous argument directly suggests that a public servant should be more knowledgeable. It is only about who they should not rely on when making decisions.

This follows the analogous argument perfectly by emphasizing that public servants, like those with serious medical conditions, should not rely on those without expertise when making decisions.

There is nothing in this argument about the conditions that make one a good public servant. The stimulus is about decision-making, not what makes a good public servant.

PrepTest 129 - Section 2 - Question 18

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action