Self-study
Lutsina: Because Support futuristic science fiction does not need to represent current social realities, Support its writers can envisage radically new social arrangements. ████ ██ ███ ███ █████████ ██ ██ █ ██████ ██████ ██ ██████ █████████ ████ ██ ████████████ ████████
██████████ ████ ██████████ ███████ ███████ ███████ ████ ██████████ ████████ █████████ ███ ████████████ ████ ███ ██████ ████████████ █████ ███ ████████ ████████████ ███ ███████████ ██ ███████ ██████████ ███████ ██ ████ ███████████ ███ ████ █████████ ██████ █████████ ███████ ████ ██████████ ██████████ ███ ███████ ██████ █████████ ███ ████████ ████████████ ██ ███████ ██ ████████████ ████████
Speaker 1 Summary
Lutsina concludes that futuristic sci-fi has the potential to be a richer source of social criticism than conventional fiction. This is because futuristic sci-fi writers can write about new social arrangements, since they don’t have to represent current social realities.
Speaker 2 Summary
Priscilla concludes that the most effective social criticism results from accurately presenting current social realities, as conventional fiction does. This view is based on the claim that futuristic sci-fi writers are better at imagining new technologies than they are at imagining new social realities. This shows that writers’ imaginations are constrained by current realities.
Objective
We’re looking for a point of disagreement. The speakers disagree about whether sci-fi or conventional fiction are the best at social criticism.
25.
Lutsina and Priscilla disagree with ████ █████ █████ ███████
a
some science fiction ███████ ████ █████████ ██ ██████████ ███████████ █████████ ███ ██████ ████████████
Neither expresses an opinion. Lutsina only speaks about potential effectiveness, not about actual successes in writing social criticism. Priscilla doesn’t say anything about successful sci-fi writers.
b
writers of conventional ███████ ███ ████ ████████ ████ ███ ███████ ██ ██████████ ███████ ███████
Neither expresses an opinion. Lutsina doesn’t discuss skill. Priscilla refers to skill at imagining technology and social arrangements, but doesn’t refer to writing skill. Neither compares writing skill among sci-fi and conventional writers.
c
futuristic science fiction ███ ████ ███████ ██ █ ██████ ██ ██████ █████████ ████ ████ ████████████ ███████
This is a point of disagreement. Lutsina thinks sci-fi does hold more promise. Priscilla thinks the most effective social criticism happens in conventional fiction (and therefore not in sci-fi).
d
envisaging radically new ████████████ ██████ ████ █████████ ███ ██████ ████████████ ██ █ ███████████ ██ ██████████ ███████ ███████
Lutsina doesn’t express an opinion about this. She refers only to envisaging new social arrangements, but says nothing about new technologies.
e
criticism of current ██████ ████████████ ██ ███ █████████ ████ █████ ████████████ ███ ██████████ ████ █████████ █████████ ████
Neither has an opinion. To Lutsina, imagining new arrangements can lead to better criticism, but that doesn’t mean anything is required to be effective. To Priscilla, current arrangements are important, but that doesn’t mean comparisons to other arrangements are required.