Commentator: The Duke of Acredia argued long ago that only virtuous Acredian rulers concerned with the well-being of the people will be able to rule successfully. βββββ βββββ ββββ ββββββββ βββββββββββ ββββ βββββββ βββββ βββββ ββββ ββββββ ββββ ββββββ βββ ββββ ββ βββ βββ βββββββββ ββββββββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββββ βββ βββββ βββββ βββ βββββ βββββ ββ βββββ βββ ββββββ βββββββ βββ βββ βββββββ ββ βββ ββββββ ββ βββββββββ βββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββββββββ ββ ββββββββ
The author concludes that concern for the welfare of people is necessary for successful governance of Acredia. This is based on the fact that whenever Acredian governments have fallen, their falls have always been during the rule of someone who didnβt care about the welfare of people.
The author overlooks the possibility that there might be some cases where Acredian governments have been successful, but the ruler didnβt care about the welfare of people. In other words, although we know that whenever governments have failed, rulers havenβt been concerned with welfare of people, that doesnβt imply that concern with welfare of people is necessary. Itβs possible there are successful Acredian governments that have also been unconcerned with welfare of people.
Analysis by KevinLin
The reasoning in the commentator's ββββββββ ββ ββββ ββββββββββ ββ βββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββ ββββ βββ ββββββββ
ignores the possibility ββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββ βββ βββββββββ βββ βββ βββββββ ββ βββ ββββββ βββ ββββββ ββ ββββββ ββββ ββββ
infers the necessity ββ β βββββββ βββββββββ βββ βββββββ ββββ βββ ββββ ββββ βββ βββββββ βββ ββββββ βββ ββ βββββββ
appeals to evidence ββββ βββββββ ββββ βββ ββββββ ββ ββ ββ ββββ βββ ββββββ ββ ββββββββββ
infers that a βββββββ βββββββββ ββ ββββββββ βββ βββββββ ββββ βββ ββββ ββββ βββ ββββ ββ ββββ βββββββββ ββ ββββββββββ ββββ βββββββ
presumes, without providing ββββββββββββββ ββββ βββ βββββββββ ββ ββββ ββββββ βββ ββ ββββββββ ββ ββββ ββββββββββ βββββββββ βββ