Ana: On libertarian principles, Conclusion I oppose the proposed smoking ban. ██ ██ ███ ███ ████████████ ████████ ██ ███████ ██████ ████ █████ ██████ ████ ████ ████ ███████████
███████ ███ ████ ██ ████ ████ ███ ███ █████ █████ ████ ██ ███████ ██ ██████ ███████ ██████ █████ █████ █████ ███ ████ ████ ██ ████████
Ana opposes the proposed smoking ban because she thinks it’s not the government’s business to prevent people from doing stuff that harms only themselves.
Pankaj points out that the proposed ban would only apply in situations that expose other people to smoking. Smoking would still be allowed in private. The implicit point is that Ana’s libertarian principle isn’t a good reason for opposing the ban.
We’re looking for a point of disagreement. They disagree over whether the proposed smoking ban would prevent people from doing things that harm only themselves. Ana thinks it would. Pankaj thinks it wouldn’t.
The dialogue provides the most ███████ ███ ███ █████ ████ ███ ███ ██████ ████████ ████ ███████
it is the ████████████ ████████ ██ ███████ ██████ ████ ███████ ██████████
government should be ██████████ ██ ███████████ ██████████
the proposed smoking ███ ██ ████████ ██ ███████ ████ ████ ██ ███████ ██████████
the proposed ban █████ ████████ ███████ ██ ██████ ██████
there are cases ██ █████ ██████████ ██████ ███████ ██ ████████ ███████ ████████