Through years of excavations and careful analysis of her finds around Krasnyi Yar in Kazakhstan, archaeologist Sandra Olsen has assembled what may be evidence of the earliest known people to have domesticated and ridden horses, a momentous development in human history. ███
Intro to Topic ·Olsen found evidence of earliest domestication of horses for riding?
Horses were buried in carefully arranged patterns which suggests a closer relationship with the Botai, consistent with the riding hypothesis.
Passage Style
Phenomenon-hypothesis
Single position
8.
Which one of the following ████ ██████████ █████████ ███ ████████ ████████ ██████ ███ ███████████ ████ █████ ████████
Question Type
Author’s attitude
Implied
The author doesn’t express any direct opinion about Olsen’s conclusions. However, given that the author describes Olsen’s evidence in detail and focuses on how she responds to potential counterevidence to her conclusions, there’s evidence the author finds Olsen’s conclusions to be reasonable.
a
forthright advocacy
This is too extreme. The author doesn’t argue that Olsen’s conclusions are correct.
b
implicit endorsement
This best captures the author’s attitude. His endorsement of Olsen’s conclusions isn’t expressly stated; it’s implicit. He describes Olsen’s reasoning in detail and discusses her response to potential counterevidence. At no point does the author suggest Olsen’s conclusions are implausible or that her reasoning is suspect. So there’s at least some support that the author endorses Olsen’s conclusions.
c
critical ambivalence
“Ambivalence” means having mixed feelings. There’s no evidence the author has mixed feelings about Olsen’s conclusions. He never expresses any doubt or other negative opinion about them. Although he raises potential counterevidence to Olsen’s conclusions, he does so for the purpose of showing Olsen’s response to that evidence.
d
reasoned skepticism
There’s no evidence the author is skeptical about Olsen’s conclusions. He never expresses any doubt or other negative opinion about them. Although he raises potential counterevidence to Olsen’s conclusions, he does so for the purpose of showing Olsen’s response to that evidence.
e
general disagreement
There’s no evidence the author disagrees with Olsen’s conclusions. He never expresses any doubt or other negative opinion about them. Although he raises potential counterevidence to Olsen’s conclusions, he does so for the purpose of showing Olsen’s response to that evidence.
Difficulty
79% of people who answer get this correct
This is a slightly challenging question.
It is similar in difficulty to other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%127
141
75%156
Analysis
Author’s attitude
Implied
Phenomenon-hypothesis
Science
Single position
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
12%
156
b
79%
162
c
7%
158
d
3%
151
e
0%
146
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.