Two competing demands we make of the law create a troubling conflict that contributes to the law's frequent failure to deliver what we imagine it should. ███
Formal justice means we want law to be rational, consistently applied, and blind to the different social and economic situations of the people it applies to.
If we can’t have the kind of equality necessary for reconciling formalism and substantive justice, we should abandon formalism in favor of substantive justice.
Passage Style
Problem-analysis
Single position
3.
The passage most strongly supports █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ██████████ █████ █ █████████ ████████ ██ ███ ████
Question Type
Implied
It’s tough to predict the answer here, since the passage said a lot of things about the formalist approach – what it is, why it conflicts with substantive justice, that it should be abandoned. We should just head into the answer choices.
a
It tends to ██ ███ ████████ ██ ███ ████████ ███ ██ ███ ████████████ ███████ ██ █████ ███████████
The author never suggests that formalism is too detailed or not based on principles that are broad enough.
b
It may satisfy ███ ███████ ██ █████████ ██████ ███ ███ ████ ██ ███████ ██ ██████ ████████
Supported by P2. By opening with the transition “On the other hand, however, we want the law to be connected to social reality” the author suggests that formalism is not connected to social reality. In the last two sentences of the paragraph, the author describes the limits of formalism – it does not necessarily take into account the social context of individual cases. Thus, formalism – although it may satisfy objective reason in that it is rational and rule-based – can “fail to connect to social reality.”
Anti-supported. In P3, the author says that formalism, even if it is applied neutrally and without prejudice, still may not produce substantive justice if it is not sensitive to social context.
d
Its tension with ███████████ ███████ ██████ ████ █████ █████████ ██████████ ██ █████████ ██████████
The approach to deductive reasoning is not mentioned as something that causes conflict between formalism and substantive justice.
e
It can be ██████████ ████ ███████████ ███████ ██ ███████████ █ ███████████ ██ ██████ █████████████
The author saus that social equality is necessary to reconcile formalism and substantive justice. But having social equality is different from “formalizing a recognition of social inequalities.” Formalizing a recognition of social inequalities would simply involve recognizing those inequalities, but would not make society more equal.
Difficulty
86% of people who answer get this correct
This is a low-difficulty question.
It is similar in difficulty to other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%123
134
75%145
Analysis
Implied
Law
Problem-analysis
Single position
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
1%
150
b
86%
158
c
4%
146
d
3%
148
e
7%
147
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.