LSAT 108 – Section 2 – Question 03

LSAT 108 - Section 2 - Question 03

February 2000

You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.

Request new explanation

Target time: 1:51

This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds

Question
QuickView		 Type Tags Answer
Choices		 Curve Question
Difficulty		 Psg/Game/S
Difficulty		 Explanation
PT108 S2 Q03
+LR
Weaken +Weak
A
74%
167
B
5%
161
C
6%
160
D
6%
165
E
10%
165
121
144
167
 +Medium 145.001 +SubsectionEasier

Columnist: Polls can influence voters’ decisions, and they may distort the outcome of an election since their results are much less reliable than the public believes. Furthermore, the publication of polls immediately prior to an election allows no response from those wishing to dispute the polls’ findings. A ban on publishing polls during the week prior to an election only minimally impairs freedom of expression, and thus should be implemented.

Summarize Argument
The columnist claims that we should ban the publication of polls during the week before an election. Why? A few reasons. Polls can influence how people vote. They’re also less reliable than people think, so can be misleading. In the week before an election, there’s also not enough time to dispute polls and correct their mistakes. Finally, only banning polls for one week minimally impairs freedom of expression.

Notable Assumptions
The columnist assumes that banning polls in the week before an election would reduce their influence over voters—in other words, that people are still influenced by such last-minute polls.
The columnist also assumes that voters have access to less-distorted sources of information that could better inform their votes in the absence of polls. Otherwise, limiting polls could hurt more than help.

A
Few people are influenced by the results of polls published during the two weeks immediately prior to an election.
This weakens the argument, because it undermines the columnist’s assumption that banning polls in the week before an election would reduce their impact on voters. If everyone has already decided how to vote based on earlier polls, then the last week doesn’t make a difference.
B
The publication of poll results would not decide the winner of an uneven election race.
This does not weaken the argument, because we can’t assume that all election races will be uneven and so not decided by polls. If it’s still possible for even elections to be unduly influenced by poll results, the author’s argument is unharmed.
C
The publication of poll results may remove some voters’ motivation to vote because of the certainty that a particular candidate will win.
This does not weaken the argument. In fact, this just backs up the columnist’s point that polls can influence election results by providing a specific example of how this takes place.
D
The publication of poll results in the last weeks before an election draws attention to candidates’ late gains in popularity.
This does not weaken the argument—it actually underscores the importance of last-minute polls, and thus affirms the columnist’s assumption that those polls make a difference.
E
Countries in which such a ban is in effect do not generally have better informed citizens than do countries in which such a ban is not in effect.
This does not weaken the argument, because the columnist isn’t claiming that a ban would result in overall better informed citizens. This also doesn’t say that voters living under such a ban are any worse informed—and even if it did, we wouldn’t know if the ban was the cause.

Take PrepTest

Review Results

LSAT PrepTest 108 Explanations

Section 1 - Reading Comprehension

Section 2 - Logical Reasoning

Section 3 - Logical Reasoning

Section 4 - Reading Comprehension

Get full LSAT course

Leave a Reply