LSAT 131 – Section 2 – Question 25
You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.
Target time: 1:37
This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds
Question QuickView |
Type | Tags | Answer Choices |
Curve | Question Difficulty |
Psg/Game/S Difficulty |
Explanation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PT131 S2 Q25 |
+LR
| Weaken +Weak Causal Reasoning +CausR | A
11%
162
B
54%
167
C
11%
160
D
9%
159
E
15%
162
|
155 164 173 |
+Hardest | 147.936 +SubsectionMedium |
J.Y.’s explanation
You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.
Summarize Argument
The author concludes that the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was much higher 3 billion years ago than it is today. This is because we know that the ocean was liquid 3 billion years ago, and that required the level of greenhouses to be higher 3 billion years ago than it is today.
Notable Assumptions
The author assumes that if greenhouse gases were higher 3 billion years ago, carbon dioxide levels must have been higher 3 billion years ago. This overlooks the possibility that there were other greenhouse gases that were higher back then, while carbon dioxide levels stayed the same or were even lower.
A
Sufficient heat to keep the oceans liquid 3 billion years ago could not have been generated through geological processes such as volcanic activity.
We already know that greenhouse gases were higher 3 billion years ago, which is what helped keep the Earth warmer. The original source of the heat doesn’t change the fact that we know greenhouse gases were higher.
B
Geological studies indicate that there is much less methane in Earth’s atmosphere today than there was 3 billion years ago.
This raises the possibility that the greater levels of greenhouse gases 3 billion years ago were due to higher levels of methane. Carbon dioxide could have been equal or lower than it is today, because methane was higher.
C
Geological evidence indicates that the oceans contained greater amounts of dissolved minerals 3 billion years ago, but not enough to alter their freezing points significantly.
We already know that the ocean was liquid and that this proves greenhouse gases were higher 3 billion years ago. The freezing point of water doesn’t change how we interpret these facts.
D
The increase in the Sun’s luminosity over the past 3 billion years roughly coincided with an increasing complexity of life forms on Earth.
How the sun’s brightness correlates with the complexity of life is irrelevant. The argument concerns levels of greenhouse gases and whether higher levels of greenhouse gases imply higher levels of carbon dioxide.
E
Because the distance from Earth to the Sun has not changed significantly over the last 3 billion years, the increase in the Sun’s luminosity has resulted in more radiation reaching Earth.
We already know the Earth was liquid and that this proves greenhouse gases were higher 3 billion years ago. Levels of radiation don’t change these facts or how we interpret them. The argument concerns whether higher levels of greenhouse gases imply higher carbon dioxide levels.
Take PrepTest
Review Results
LSAT PrepTest 131 Explanations
Section 1 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
Section 2 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
- Question 26
Section 3 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment. You can get a free account here.