LSAT 144 – Section 4 – Question 03

LSAT 144 - Section 4 - Question 03

October 2015

You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.

Request new explanation

Target time: 0:56

This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds

Question
QuickView		 Type Tags Answer
Choices		 Curve Question
Difficulty		 Psg/Game/S
Difficulty		 Explanation
PT144 S4 Q03
+LR
Resolve reconcile or explain +RRE
Causal Reasoning +CausR
Net Effect +NetEff
A
4%
156
B
1%
154
C
1%
151
D
94%
165
E
0%
146
130
138
147
 +Easier 147.675 +SubsectionMedium

Live Commentary

You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.

The official listing of an animal species as endangered triggers the enforcement of legal safeguards designed to protect endangered species, such as tighter animal export and trade restrictions and stronger antipoaching laws. Nevertheless, there have been many cases in which the decline in the wild population of a species was more rapid after that species was listed as endangered than before it was so listed.

"Surprising" Phenomenon

Why have some animal species declined faster in the wild after being listed as endangered, even though this status is meant to provide legal protection?

Objective

The correct answer will be a hypothesis that explains how listing a species as endangered can lead to an increase in the rate of population decline. It will explain a key difference between the intended legal protections and the actual consequences of listing a species as endangered by connecting population decline to public awareness or attention around the endangered species.

A
The process of officially listing a species as endangered can take many years.

This might explain why the rate of population decline continues after a species is listed as endangered (perhaps the listing came too late and the damage is done), but it does not explain why the rate of population decline increases as soon as an animal is listed as endangered.

B
Public campaigns to save endangered animal species often focus only on those species that garner the public’s affection.

This does not connect public attention around endangered animals to the rate of decline in the animals’ population, so it does not help us to explain why a species’ rate of population decline increases after it is listed as endangered.

C
The number of animal species listed as endangered has recently increased dramatically.

This does not explain the connection between the “endangered” status and an increase in population decline. There may be more endangered species than ever, but we still do not know why population decline increases after a species is listed as endangered.

D
Animals are more desirable to collectors when they are perceived to be rare.

This is the only answer choice that could explain the endangered status leading to increased population decline. The perceived rarity of an endangered species makes it more desirable to collectors, who are more likely to illegally obtain it and thus increase population decline.

E
Poachers find it progressively more difficult to locate animals of a particular species as that species’ population declines.

This does not explain why a species’ population decline increases after it is listed as endangered. If anything, poachers’ inability to locate a particular species might decrease that species’ population decline.

Take PrepTest

Review Results

LSAT PrepTest 144 Explanations

Section 1 - Reading Comprehension

Section 2 - Logical Reasoning

Section 3 - Logical Reasoning

Section 4 - Logical Reasoning

Get full LSAT course

Leave a Reply