It really bothers me that "even if" can = "and" in logic. Because I feel like "and" implies that both those things are true whereas "even if" just implies that one is not necessarily wrong, but that does not mean it is necessarily true either, like and implies.
11
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
7 comments
Amy rejected Mark. He's a good friend, but he's not husband material.
good friend and /husband material -> rejected
Is this correct use of lawgic? Just trying to better understand these examples
Is there suppose to be a video attached here? Or is it just not showing up for me? Thanks!
It really bothers me that "even if" can = "and" in logic. Because I feel like "and" implies that both those things are true whereas "even if" just implies that one is not necessarily wrong, but that does not mean it is necessarily true either, like and implies.