14 comments

  • Yesterday

    would've been helpful to see the examples translated into Lawgic

    1
  • Edited Wednesday, Feb 25

    For clairification, it looks like the only example here that is a conditional statement is "The school does hire substitute teachers, but only ones with experience." Translating this to Lawgic:

    Hired by school --> Substitute with experience

    OR

    /Substitute with experience --> /Hired by school

    Am I correctly identifying this as a conditional and, if so, did I correctly identify the sufficient and necessary conditions?

    2
  • Friday, Jan 30

    So using "but" or "even if" is essentially the same as the conjunction indictor "and" as far as grammar is concerned, it is just a more specific way of saying it, because it implies contrast between the clauses.

    1
  • Thursday, Dec 18 2025

    While this makes sense, none of these examples are conditional statements, right? So I am a little bit confused as to why it is important in this scenario to know that BUT and EVEN IF can be conjunction indicators.

    8
  • Edited Saturday, Sep 20 2025

    Amy rejected Mark. He's a good friend, but he's not husband material.

    good friend and /husband material -> rejected

    Is this correct use of lawgic? Just trying to better understand these examples

    2
  • Sunday, Jul 06 2025

    Is there suppose to be a video attached here? Or is it just not showing up for me? Thanks!

    14
  • Friday, Jun 20 2025

    It really bothers me that "even if" can = "and" in logic. Because I feel like "and" implies that both those things are true whereas "even if" just implies that one is not necessarily wrong, but that does not mean it is necessarily true either, like and implies.

    15

Confirm action

Are you sure?