this is the perfect nec assumption question if you diagram it. stick close to the stimulus and you will clearly see why the others are wrong and why a is right.
if benefits constituents, then consider the consequences.
conclusion is that legislatures do not pass laws that benefit constituents, why because they arouse repugnance or enthusiasm. so if repug and ethus then does not consider consequences. exactly what d says.
A. if benefit constituents then legislature is less concerned with their own careers. this is irrelevant to the argument. how do we know that's true? they dont talk about that.
b. successful leg? so what
c. how do we know when they adhere to these laws? who really cares?
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
3 comments
Here is my analysis:
this is the perfect nec assumption question if you diagram it. stick close to the stimulus and you will clearly see why the others are wrong and why a is right.
if benefits constituents, then consider the consequences.
conclusion is that legislatures do not pass laws that benefit constituents, why because they arouse repugnance or enthusiasm. so if repug and ethus then does not consider consequences. exactly what d says.
A. if benefit constituents then legislature is less concerned with their own careers. this is irrelevant to the argument. how do we know that's true? they dont talk about that.
b. successful leg? so what
c. how do we know when they adhere to these laws? who really cares?
e. who cares about their inability?
Linked to the question so people have an easier time helping you out.
Bumping this.