Subscription pricing
I'm totally lost with this question. So when the Hvirus inserts itself into a chromosome of an animal, fragments of the virus are passed onto the descendants. The zebra finch and junco both have the hvirus fragments in the same location. They diverged 25 millions years ago, so therefore the hvirus is 25 million years old.
I just can't see any assumptions the argument is making. In my opinion, C might weaken the argument if the insertion occurs at a random spot. Doesn't this contradict that the fragments are in the same location?
Thanks!
0
7 comments
> @madelineleibin913 said:
> And how would be disprove answer choice A?
It took me a few reviews to finally see C as the correct AC, i chose A under timed. The reason why A is wrong is because the conclusion is that the virus is 25 million years old. Saying that viruses can affect the evolution of an organism is completely irrelevant to that conclusion. The premise isn't that the virus caused the divergence in species. Rather, it's that a ancestor of the 2 species existed 25 million years ago and that the hepadnavirus was within that ancestor's DNA/chromosomes. There are definitely other gaps in the argument but that's why A isn't stregnthening.
And how would be disprove answer choice A?
@seema731 & @stepharizona288 This was a tricky one for sure... I too thought it was a weakener and had written "No has to be a copy"/same spot next to it... it wasn't till the call I realized this supported that it DID in fact mean that... Tricky LSAT...
Wow, thank you!
@stepharizona288 I was also on that BR call last night and still confused, but your explanation to me explains everything!!
Thank You!!!!
I just can't see any assumptions the argument is making. In my opinion, C might weaken the argument if the insertion occurs at a random spot. Doesn't this contradict that the fragments are in the same location?
I was thinking the same thing, as it needs to be a copy BUT this does in fact strengthen it, because if viruses inject themselves randomly the marker wouldnt be in the same spot in the two birds. I have a slightly different taken than @chiuduncan26 but as along the same lines if it is random it makes it unlikely that two birds would have it in the same spot, unless they have had it "copied" into their DNA at the same spot.
We are told the species diverged 25 million years ago. If virus go into the DNA in a random spot, it is highly unlikely that the birds would have HV in the same spot in their DNA unless it was there before the divergence occurred. So because HV was there before the two species happened, it is present in the same place in their DNA.
My reasoning for believing that C would strengthen it is because if the insertion occurs at a random spot when a species initially receives it, and the two birds have it in the exact same spot, it strengthens the arguments that the virus was contracted 25 million years ago by an ancestor.
Think about it: If the HV is always in the same spot, who cares if the birds have it in the exact same spot? Everyone would have it in the exact same spot. If it were in the same spot, the two birds could have got it at any time after diverging from their ancestor. This element of randomness makes that highly unlikely.