3 comments

  • Wednesday, Sep 13 2017

    @ksneha2409921 said:

    Hey

    Thanks, I wasn't aware, just edited my post.

    Also, looked at this again today, and I can't believe i was stuck with this question yesterday! Haha

    Thank you so much though :)

    Great :) I edited my post as well.

    0
  • Wednesday, Sep 13 2017

    Hey

    Thanks, I wasn't aware, just edited my post.

    Also, looked at this again today, and I can't believe i was stuck with this question yesterday! Haha

    Thank you so much though :)

    0
  • Wednesday, Sep 13 2017

    Hi @ksneha2409921,

    https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-27-section-4-question-07/

    P: know a lot about history —> easy to impress intellectuals

    P: /(read a large number of history books) —> /(know a lot about history)

    ———————

    C: /(know a lot about history) —> /(easy to impress intellectuals)

    Invalid Argument Structure

    A —> B

    ———

    /A —> /B

    The argument is making a sufficiency-necessity confusion flaw. B is wrong because it does not address the flaw. The presence of people who know history but don't impress intellectuals is nothing to do with the argument.

    Could you maybe elaborate on why you think B could be describing the flaw?

    0

Confirm action

Are you sure?