Subscription pricing
I got the question right, but any idea how to translate this into lawgic?
https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-24-section-2-question-24/
0
Select Preptest
I got the question right, but any idea how to translate this into lawgic?
https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-24-section-2-question-24/
Select Preptest
2 comments
@ksneha2409921 Thank you for your prompt responses :) Good to know I'd mapped it out correctly!
We're provided with a premise and conclusion. We just have to fill in the blank by deploying the A -> B -> C strategy.
Given Premise: Mathematical proposition -> /True by observation
A->B -> C: Mathematical proposition -> /True by observation -> /Know that it is true
Given Conclusion: Mathematical Proposition --> /Know that it is true
We have to look for an answer in the ACs which highlights the B -> C relationship. AC (E) does this perfectly by utilizing a contrapositive of B -> C (know that it is true --> true by observation).