Soooo maybe I’m wrong or maybe I’m crazy but I just figured out that with disagree and agree questions, the answer appeals to the conclusion of the first speaker. Is that a hack or am I reaching
Another possible spot for a disagreement: the factual accuracy of a premise stated. This is a bit non-LSAT'ish, but on disagree questions, if one person states as fact that a certain proposition is true in the world, a possible disagreement can occur when the other person says: no, that is not the case.
PT 66-4-23 about shrimp farming is an example that comes to mind.
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Sorry, you need a subscription for that.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
5 comments
I will say that on PT84 there were a lot more agree with a bit of an inference than disagree questions.
Thanks everyone. I knew it was too good to be true.
Another possible spot for a disagreement: the factual accuracy of a premise stated. This is a bit non-LSAT'ish, but on disagree questions, if one person states as fact that a certain proposition is true in the world, a possible disagreement can occur when the other person says: no, that is not the case.
PT 66-4-23 about shrimp farming is an example that comes to mind.
There is no hack to the LSAT. You are reaching.
I believe this is a reach in my experience. The actual disagreement can occur in any number of spots:
1.Flat out disagreement about the conclusion
2. Disagreement about whether or not the evidence provide is sufficient for the conclusion
3.Disagreement about an assumption in the argument
David