The proposed change will be put to a majority vote ONLY IF the group of tenants can obtain the signatures of 10% of tenants and the argument concludes the pet lovers were voted down, but in order to be voted down, it assumes there must have been a vote in the first place. And what is required for there to be a vote? tenants must have been able to get 10% of tenant signatures so if that condition is not fulfilled, then we cannot conclude the pet lovers were voted down because a majority vote didn't happen at all
If my explanation is wrong, could someone point it out? don't want to accidently give misleading answers but this is my take
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
2 comments
I think thats right @ashleytien240
Basically, they got a vote (but they lost), so they had to have obtained the 10%.
Ooo, this thing is tricky.
The proposed change will be put to a majority vote ONLY IF the group of tenants can obtain the signatures of 10% of tenants and the argument concludes the pet lovers were voted down, but in order to be voted down, it assumes there must have been a vote in the first place. And what is required for there to be a vote? tenants must have been able to get 10% of tenant signatures so if that condition is not fulfilled, then we cannot conclude the pet lovers were voted down because a majority vote didn't happen at all
If my explanation is wrong, could someone point it out? don't want to accidently give misleading answers but this is my take