Subscription pricing
Can someone help me to identify opponent's argument, since I don't see clearly where is a conclusion and where are premises. All I see is a set of premises with unstated(assumed) conclusion. Thank you!! #help
Admin note: edited title; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]"
0
1 comments
It's implied that they are arguing against irradiation of food. There is no stated conclusion, but you don't need one to answer this question. Even if you were to assume a less supported conclusion the answer would still be the same.