I remember listening to a podcast that said it was innate and there was really no point in studying. It really shot my confidence because I started out at 147. BUT studying now and seeing improvement, I can definitely say it is acquired. There may be people who are more naturally attuned to test taking but, like everything in life, it is learnable.
I used to teach and the concepts of growth mindset and fixed mindset helped a lot in getting unstuck from that initial thought process. There is also a book called Grit by Angela Duckworth that I recommend.
Also it's super inspiring to listen to other 7Sagers' speak about their experiences on the 7Sage podcast.
I'm not sure what "innate skills" is supposed to mean but any differences in these hypothetical skills are attributable to differences in native intellectual ability. Assuming average+ natural intelligence, all of the skills needed to do very well on the test can be acquired with time and effort. But individuals absolutely do vary in natural intellectual capacity and therefore have different performance ceilings.
The question is flawed in that the author fails to consider the possibility that some combination of innate and learned skills contribute to LSAT test taking ability.
Basic schooling does teach everyone certain basics (such as Reading Comprehension) and as we move into university, we branch out into various disciplines that require the use of logical reasoning and applied methods of reading comprehension. So, based on schooling we develop this skills but there are still certain individuals who have an innate ability and are naturally gifted in these areas. While I would say many of us acquire the skill (through studying the LSATs), there is still a small percentage of students who don't require studying and thus don't require the acquisition of skill (because they have already honed in on it without formal studies).
I believe its acquired, naturally some people are more critical thinkers from a young age, and over time continue to work on this. Its apparent when we see new test takers score in high %tiles. Regardless, there have been countless stories of people who go from 140 to 170+
I think that some people can naturally think in the LSAT way better, but the test taking skills can definitely be acquired. If you have the time and money to spare, you can learn the test and score high.
3
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
10 comments
I remember listening to a podcast that said it was innate and there was really no point in studying. It really shot my confidence because I started out at 147. BUT studying now and seeing improvement, I can definitely say it is acquired. There may be people who are more naturally attuned to test taking but, like everything in life, it is learnable.
I used to teach and the concepts of growth mindset and fixed mindset helped a lot in getting unstuck from that initial thought process. There is also a book called Grit by Angela Duckworth that I recommend.
Also it's super inspiring to listen to other 7Sagers' speak about their experiences on the 7Sage podcast.
I'm not sure what "innate skills" is supposed to mean but any differences in these hypothetical skills are attributable to differences in native intellectual ability. Assuming average+ natural intelligence, all of the skills needed to do very well on the test can be acquired with time and effort. But individuals absolutely do vary in natural intellectual capacity and therefore have different performance ceilings.
The question is flawed in that the author fails to consider the possibility that some combination of innate and learned skills contribute to LSAT test taking ability.
Basic schooling does teach everyone certain basics (such as Reading Comprehension) and as we move into university, we branch out into various disciplines that require the use of logical reasoning and applied methods of reading comprehension. So, based on schooling we develop this skills but there are still certain individuals who have an innate ability and are naturally gifted in these areas. While I would say many of us acquire the skill (through studying the LSATs), there is still a small percentage of students who don't require studying and thus don't require the acquisition of skill (because they have already honed in on it without formal studies).
I definitely acquired all the skills LOL
Some people have the skills innately, but for those that do not the test is 100% learnable without a doubt. Just takes the time and the effort.
If it were strictly innate, we'd all be very stupid to subscribe to 7sage.
I believe its acquired, naturally some people are more critical thinkers from a young age, and over time continue to work on this. Its apparent when we see new test takers score in high %tiles. Regardless, there have been countless stories of people who go from 140 to 170+
mix!
I think that some people can naturally think in the LSAT way better, but the test taking skills can definitely be acquired. If you have the time and money to spare, you can learn the test and score high.